ruff/crates/ruff_linter
GiGaGon 50bf3fa45a
[flake8-pie] Add fix safety section to PIE794 (#18802)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:

- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
  requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->

## Summary

<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->

Part of #15584

This PR adds a fix safety section to `PIE794`

I could not track down when this rule was initially implemented/made
unsafe due how old it could be + multiple large refactors to `ruff`.

There is no comment/reasoning in the code given for the unsafety.

Here is a code example demonstrating why it should be unsafe, since
removing any of the assignments would change program behavior
[playground](https://play.ruff.rs/01004644-4259-4449-a581-5007cd59846a)
```py
class A:
    x = 1
    x = 2
    print(x)

class B:
    x = print(3)
    x = print(4)

class C:
    x = [1,2,3]
    y = x
    x = y[1]
```

## Test Plan

<!-- How was it tested? -->

N/A, no tests affected.

---------

Co-authored-by: Dylan <dylwil3@gmail.com>
2025-06-19 21:51:23 +00:00
..
resources [flake8-comprehensions] Handle template strings for comprehension fixes (#18710) 2025-06-19 16:23:46 -05:00
src [flake8-pie] Add fix safety section to PIE794 (#18802) 2025-06-19 21:51:23 +00:00
Cargo.toml Bump 0.12.0 (#18724) 2025-06-17 11:05:59 -04:00