mirror of
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff.git
synced 2025-10-26 01:48:17 +00:00
1f8297cfe6
## Summary - Type checkers (and type-checker authors) think in terms of types, but I think most Python users think in terms of values. Rather than saying that a _type_ `X` "has no attribute `foo`" (which I think sounds strange to many users), say that "an object of type `X` has no attribute `foo`" - Special-case certain types so that the diagnostic messages read more like normal English: rather than saying "Type `<class 'Foo'>` has no attribute `bar`" or "Object of type `<class 'Foo'>` has no attribute `bar`", just say "Class `Foo` has no attribute `bar`" ## Test Plan Mdtests and snapshots updated |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| basic.md | ||
| builtins.md | ||
| case_sensitive.md | ||
| conditional.md | ||
| conflicts.md | ||
| conventions.md | ||
| cyclic.md | ||
| dunder_all.md | ||
| errors.md | ||
| invalid_syntax.md | ||
| legacy_namespace.md | ||
| module_getattr.md | ||
| namespace.md | ||
| partial_stub_packages.md | ||
| relative.md | ||
| site_packages_discovery.md | ||
| star.md | ||
| stub_packages.md | ||
| stubs.md | ||
| tracking.md | ||