ruff/crates/ruff_python_formatter
Brent Westbrook 97d0659ce3
Pass ParserOptions to the parser (#16220)
## Summary

This is part of the preparation for detecting syntax errors in the
parser from https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/16090/. As suggested
in [this
comment](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/16090/#discussion_r1953084509),
I started working on a `ParseOptions` struct that could be stored in the
parser. For this initial refactor, I only made it hold the existing
`Mode` option, but for syntax errors, we will also need it to have a
`PythonVersion`. For that use case, I'm picturing something like a
`ParseOptions::with_python_version` method, so you can extend the
current calls to something like

```rust
ParseOptions::from(mode).with_python_version(settings.target_version)
```

But I thought it was worth adding `ParseOptions` alone without changing
any other behavior first.

Most of the diff is just updating call sites taking `Mode` to take
`ParseOptions::from(Mode)` or those taking `PySourceType`s to take
`ParseOptions::from(PySourceType)`. The interesting changes are in the
new `parser/options.rs` file and smaller parts of `parser/mod.rs` and
`ruff_python_parser/src/lib.rs`.

## Test Plan

Existing tests, this should not change any behavior.
2025-02-19 10:50:50 -05:00
..
resources/test/fixtures Use ast::PythonVersion internally in the formatter and linter (#16170) 2025-02-18 12:03:13 -05:00
src Pass ParserOptions to the parser (#16220) 2025-02-19 10:50:50 -05:00
tests Pass ParserOptions to the parser (#16220) 2025-02-19 10:50:50 -05:00
Cargo.toml Bump MSRV to Rust 1.80 (#13826) 2024-10-20 10:55:36 +02:00
CONTRIBUTING.md Update pre-commit dependencies (#14719) 2024-12-02 06:02:56 +00:00
generate.py Standardise ruff config (#15558) 2025-01-21 12:09:11 +01:00
orphan_rules_in_the_formatter.svg Generate FormatRule definitions (#4724) 2023-06-01 08:38:53 +02:00
README.md Add f-string formatting to the docs (#15367) 2025-01-09 10:20:06 +01:00

Ruff Formatter

The Ruff formatter is an extremely fast Python code formatter that ships as part of the ruff CLI.

Goals

The formatter is designed to be a drop-in replacement for Black, but with an excessive focus on performance and direct integration with Ruff.

Specifically, the formatter is intended to emit near-identical output when run over Black-formatted code. When run over extensive Black-formatted projects like Django and Zulip, > 99.9% of lines are formatted identically. When migrating an existing project from Black to Ruff, you should expect to see a few differences on the margins, but the vast majority of your code should be unchanged.

If you identify deviations in your project, spot-check them against the intentional deviations enumerated below, as well as the unintentional deviations filed in the issue tracker. If you've identified a new deviation, please file an issue.

When run over non-Black-formatted code, the formatter makes some different decisions than Black, and so more deviations should be expected, especially around the treatment of end-of-line comments. For details, see Style Guide.

Getting started

Head to The Ruff Formatter for usage instructions and a comparison to Black.