![]() ## Summary This is part of the preparation for detecting syntax errors in the parser from https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/16090/. As suggested in [this comment](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/16090/#discussion_r1953084509), I started working on a `ParseOptions` struct that could be stored in the parser. For this initial refactor, I only made it hold the existing `Mode` option, but for syntax errors, we will also need it to have a `PythonVersion`. For that use case, I'm picturing something like a `ParseOptions::with_python_version` method, so you can extend the current calls to something like ```rust ParseOptions::from(mode).with_python_version(settings.target_version) ``` But I thought it was worth adding `ParseOptions` alone without changing any other behavior first. Most of the diff is just updating call sites taking `Mode` to take `ParseOptions::from(Mode)` or those taking `PySourceType`s to take `ParseOptions::from(PySourceType)`. The interesting changes are in the new `parser/options.rs` file and smaller parts of `parser/mod.rs` and `ruff_python_parser/src/lib.rs`. ## Test Plan Existing tests, this should not change any behavior. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
resources/test/fixtures | ||
src | ||
tests | ||
Cargo.toml | ||
CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
generate.py | ||
orphan_rules_in_the_formatter.svg | ||
README.md |
Ruff Formatter
The Ruff formatter is an extremely fast Python code formatter that ships as part of the ruff
CLI.
Goals
The formatter is designed to be a drop-in replacement for Black, but with an excessive focus on performance and direct integration with Ruff.
Specifically, the formatter is intended to emit near-identical output when run over Black-formatted code. When run over extensive Black-formatted projects like Django and Zulip, > 99.9% of lines are formatted identically. When migrating an existing project from Black to Ruff, you should expect to see a few differences on the margins, but the vast majority of your code should be unchanged.
If you identify deviations in your project, spot-check them against the intentional deviations enumerated below, as well as the unintentional deviations filed in the issue tracker. If you've identified a new deviation, please file an issue.
When run over non-Black-formatted code, the formatter makes some different decisions than Black, and so more deviations should be expected, especially around the treatment of end-of-line comments. For details, see Style Guide.
Getting started
Head to The Ruff Formatter for usage instructions and a comparison to Black.