ruff/crates/red_knot_python_semantic/resources
Joey Bar e8e24310fb
[red-knot] Handle gradual intersection types in assignability (#16611)
## Summary

This mostly fixes #14899

My motivation was similar to the last comment by @sharkdp there. I ran
red_knot on a codebase and the most common error was patterns like this
failing:

```
def foo(x: str): ...

x: Any = ...
if isinstance(x, str):
    foo(x) # Object of type `Any & str` cannot be assigned to parameter 1 (`x`) of function `foo`; expected type `str`
```

The desired behavior is pretty much to ignore Any/Unknown when resolving
intersection assignability - `Any & str` should be assignable to `str`,
and `str` should be assignable to `str & Any`
 
The fix is actually very similar to the existing code in
`is_subtype_of`, we need to correctly handle intersections on either
side, while being careful to handle dynamic types as desired.

This does not fix the second test case from that issue:

```
static_assert(is_assignable_to(Intersection[Unrelated, Any], Not[tuple[Unrelated, Any]]))
```

but that's misleading because the root cause there has nothing to do
with gradual types. I added a simpler test case that also fails:

```
static_assert(is_assignable_to(Unrelated, Not[tuple[Unrelated]]))
```
This is because we don't determine that Unrelated does not subclass from
tuple so we can't rule out this relation. If that logic is improved then
this fix should also handle the case of the intersection

## Test Plan

Added a bunch of is_assignable_to tests, most of which failed before
this fix.
2025-03-11 07:58:56 -07:00
..
mdtest [red-knot] Handle gradual intersection types in assignability (#16611) 2025-03-11 07:58:56 -07:00
README.md [red-knot] document test framework (#13695) 2024-10-10 12:02:01 -07:00

Markdown files within the mdtest/ subdirectory are tests of type inference and type checking; executed by the tests/mdtest.rs integration test.

See crates/red_knot_test/README.md for documentation of this test format.