mirror of
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff.git
synced 2025-09-27 20:42:10 +00:00
9910ec700c
Some checks are pending
CI / cargo build (msrv) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / Determine changes (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo fmt (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo clippy (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (linux) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (linux, release) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (windows) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo test (wasm) (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo build (release) (push) Waiting to run
CI / cargo fuzz build (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / fuzz parser (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test scripts (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / ecosystem (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / Fuzz for new ty panics (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / cargo shear (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / python package (push) Waiting to run
CI / pre-commit (push) Waiting to run
CI / mkdocs (push) Waiting to run
CI / formatter instabilities and black similarity (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / test ruff-lsp (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / check playground (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / benchmarks (push) Blocked by required conditions
[ty Playground] Release / publish (push) Waiting to run
## Summary
With this PR we now detect that x is always defined in `use`:
```py
if flag and (x := number):
use(x)
```
When outside if, it's still detected as possibly not defined
```py
flag and (x := number)
# error: [possibly-unresolved-reference]
use(x)
```
In order to achieve that, I had to find a way to get access to the
flow-snapshots of the boolean expression when analyzing the flow of the
if statement. I did it by special casing the visitor of boolean
expression to return flow control information, exporting two snapshots -
`maybe_short_circuit` and `no_short_circuit`. When indexing
boolean expression itself we must assume all possible flows, but when
it's inside if statement, we can be smarter than that.
## Test Plan
Fixed existing and added new mdtests.
I went through some of mypy primer results and they look fine
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| annotations | ||
| assignment | ||
| binary | ||
| boolean | ||
| boundness_declaredness | ||
| call | ||
| class | ||
| comparison | ||
| comprehensions | ||
| conditional | ||
| declaration | ||
| diagnostics | ||
| directives | ||
| doc | ||
| exception | ||
| expression | ||
| function | ||
| generics | ||
| import | ||
| literal | ||
| loops | ||
| narrow | ||
| regression | ||
| scopes | ||
| shadowing | ||
| snapshots | ||
| stubs | ||
| subscript | ||
| suppressions | ||
| type_of | ||
| type_properties | ||
| type_qualifiers | ||
| unary | ||
| with | ||
| .mdformat.toml | ||
| attributes.md | ||
| cycle.md | ||
| dataclass_transform.md | ||
| dataclasses.md | ||
| decorators.md | ||
| descriptor_protocol.md | ||
| final.md | ||
| intersection_types.md | ||
| invalid_syntax.md | ||
| known_constants.md | ||
| mdtest_config.md | ||
| mdtest_custom_typeshed.md | ||
| metaclass.md | ||
| mro.md | ||
| named_tuple.md | ||
| overloads.md | ||
| pep695_type_aliases.md | ||
| properties.md | ||
| protocols.md | ||
| slots.md | ||
| statically_known_branches.md | ||
| sys_platform.md | ||
| sys_version_info.md | ||
| terminal_statements.md | ||
| type_api.md | ||
| typed_dict.md | ||
| union_types.md | ||
| unpacking.md | ||
| unreachable.md | ||