mirror of
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff.git
synced 2025-10-25 17:38:19 +00:00
1f8297cfe6
## Summary - Type checkers (and type-checker authors) think in terms of types, but I think most Python users think in terms of values. Rather than saying that a _type_ `X` "has no attribute `foo`" (which I think sounds strange to many users), say that "an object of type `X` has no attribute `foo`" - Special-case certain types so that the diagnostic messages read more like normal English: rather than saying "Type `<class 'Foo'>` has no attribute `bar`" or "Object of type `<class 'Foo'>` has no attribute `bar`", just say "Class `Foo` has no attribute `bar`" ## Test Plan Mdtests and snapshots updated |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| annotated.md | ||
| any.md | ||
| callable.md | ||
| deferred.md | ||
| int_float_complex.md | ||
| invalid.md | ||
| literal.md | ||
| literal_string.md | ||
| never.md | ||
| new_types.md | ||
| optional.md | ||
| self.md | ||
| starred.md | ||
| stdlib_typing_aliases.md | ||
| string.md | ||
| union.md | ||
| unsupported_special_forms.md | ||
| unsupported_special_types.md | ||
| unsupported_type_qualifiers.md | ||