ruff/crates/ruff_python_parser/tests
Junhson Jean-Baptiste 2a4d835132
Use the common OperatorPrecedence for the parser (#16747)
## Summary

This change continues to resolve #16071 (and continues the work started
in #16162). Specifically, this PR changes the code in the parser so that
it uses the `OperatorPrecedence` struct from `ruff_python_ast` instead
of its own version. This is part of an effort to get rid of the
redundant definitions of `OperatorPrecedence` throughout the codebase.

Note that this PR only makes this change for `ruff_python_parser` -- we
still want to make a similar change for the formatter (namely the
`OperatorPrecedence` defined in the expression part of the formatter,
the pattern one is different). I separated the work to keep the PRs
small and easily reviewable.

## Test Plan

Because this is an internal change, I didn't add any additional tests.
Existing tests do pass.
2025-03-21 09:40:37 +05:30
..
snapshots Use the common OperatorPrecedence for the parser (#16747) 2025-03-21 09:40:37 +05:30
fixtures.rs Document LinterResult::has_syntax_error and add Parsed::has_no_syntax_errors (#16443) 2025-03-04 08:35:38 -05:00
generate_inline_tests.rs Replace LALRPOP parser with hand-written parser (#10036) 2024-04-18 17:57:39 +05:30