mirror of
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff.git
synced 2025-07-23 13:05:58 +00:00
![]() <!-- Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing, please consider the following: - Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.) - Does this pull request include a descriptive title? - Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues? --> ## Summary This PR replaces the `verbatim_text` builder with a `not_yet_implemented` builder that emits `NOT_YET_IMPLEMENTED_<NodeKind>` for not yet implemented nodes. The motivation for this change is that partially formatting compound statements can result in incorrectly indented code, which is a syntax error: ```python def func_no_args(): a; b; c if True: raise RuntimeError if False: ... for i in range(10): print(i) continue ``` Get's reformatted to ```python def func_no_args(): a; b; c if True: raise RuntimeError if False: ... for i in range(10): print(i) continue ``` because our formatter does not yet support `for` statements and just inserts the text from the source. ## Downsides Using an identifier will not work in all situations. For example, an identifier is invalid in an `Arguments ` position. That's why I kept `verbatim_text` around and e.g. use it in the `Arguments` formatting logic where incorrect indentations are impossible (to my knowledge). Meaning, `verbatim_text` we can opt in to `verbatim_text` when we want to iterate quickly on nodes that we don't want to provide a full implementation yet and using an identifier would be invalid. ## Upsides Running this on main discovered stability issues with the newline handling that were previously "hidden" because of the verbatim formatting. I guess that's an upside :) ## Test Plan None? |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
resources/test/fixtures | ||
src | ||
Cargo.toml | ||
Docs.md | ||
generate.py | ||
orphan_rules_in_the_formatter.svg |