internal: more reasonable grammar for blocks

Consider these expples

        { 92 }
  async { 92 }
    'a: { 92 }
   #[a] { 92 }

Previously the tree for them were

  BLOCK_EXPR
    { ... }

  EFFECT_EXPR
    async
    BLOCK_EXPR
      { ... }

  EFFECT_EXPR
    'a:
    BLOCK_EXPR
      { ... }

  BLOCK_EXPR
    #[a]
    { ... }

As you see, it gets progressively worse :) The last two items are
especially odd. The last one even violates the balanced curleys
invariant we have (#10357) The new approach is to say that the stuff in
`{}` is stmt_list, and the block is stmt_list + optional modifiers

  BLOCK_EXPR
    STMT_LIST
      { ... }

  BLOCK_EXPR
    async
    STMT_LIST
      { ... }

  BLOCK_EXPR
    'a:
    STMT_LIST
      { ... }

  BLOCK_EXPR
    #[a]
    STMT_LIST
      { ... }
This commit is contained in:
Aleksey Kladov 2021-09-26 12:12:57 +03:00
parent c51a3c78cf
commit 2bf81922f7
233 changed files with 11762 additions and 11343 deletions

View file

@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ fn highlight_exit_points(
match anc {
ast::Fn(fn_) => hl(sema, fn_.body().map(ast::Expr::BlockExpr)),
ast::ClosureExpr(closure) => hl(sema, closure.body()),
ast::EffectExpr(effect) => if matches!(effect.effect(), ast::Effect::Async(_) | ast::Effect::Try(_)| ast::Effect::Const(_)) {
hl(sema, effect.block_expr().map(ast::Expr::BlockExpr))
ast::BlockExpr(block_expr) => if matches!(block_expr.modifier(), Some(ast::BlockModifier::Async(_) | ast::BlockModifier::Try(_)| ast::BlockModifier::Const(_))) {
hl(sema, Some(block_expr.into()))
} else {
continue;
},
@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ fn highlight_break_points(token: SyntaxToken) -> Option<Vec<HighlightedRange>> {
fn hl(
token: Option<SyntaxToken>,
label: Option<ast::Label>,
body: Option<ast::BlockExpr>,
body: Option<ast::StmtList>,
) -> Option<Vec<HighlightedRange>> {
let mut highlights = Vec::new();
let range = cover_range(
@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ fn highlight_break_points(token: SyntaxToken) -> Option<Vec<HighlightedRange>> {
ast::LoopExpr(l) => l.label().and_then(|it| it.lifetime()),
ast::ForExpr(f) => f.label().and_then(|it| it.lifetime()),
ast::WhileExpr(w) => w.label().and_then(|it| it.lifetime()),
ast::EffectExpr(b) => Some(b.label().and_then(|it| it.lifetime())?),
ast::BlockExpr(b) => Some(b.label().and_then(|it| it.lifetime())?),
_ => return None,
}
};
@ -218,16 +218,16 @@ fn highlight_break_points(token: SyntaxToken) -> Option<Vec<HighlightedRange>> {
for anc in token.ancestors().flat_map(ast::Expr::cast) {
return match anc {
ast::Expr::LoopExpr(l) if label_matches(l.label()) => {
hl(l.loop_token(), l.label(), l.loop_body())
hl(l.loop_token(), l.label(), l.loop_body().and_then(|it| it.stmt_list()))
}
ast::Expr::ForExpr(f) if label_matches(f.label()) => {
hl(f.for_token(), f.label(), f.loop_body())
hl(f.for_token(), f.label(), f.loop_body().and_then(|it| it.stmt_list()))
}
ast::Expr::WhileExpr(w) if label_matches(w.label()) => {
hl(w.while_token(), w.label(), w.loop_body())
hl(w.while_token(), w.label(), w.loop_body().and_then(|it| it.stmt_list()))
}
ast::Expr::EffectExpr(e) if e.label().is_some() && label_matches(e.label()) => {
hl(None, e.label(), e.block_expr())
ast::Expr::BlockExpr(e) if e.label().is_some() && label_matches(e.label()) => {
hl(None, e.label(), e.stmt_list())
}
_ => continue,
};
@ -258,7 +258,12 @@ fn highlight_yield_points(token: SyntaxToken) -> Option<Vec<HighlightedRange>> {
return match_ast! {
match anc {
ast::Fn(fn_) => hl(fn_.async_token(), fn_.body().map(ast::Expr::BlockExpr)),
ast::EffectExpr(effect) => hl(effect.async_token(), effect.block_expr().map(ast::Expr::BlockExpr)),
ast::BlockExpr(block_expr) => {
if block_expr.async_token().is_none() {
continue;
}
hl(block_expr.async_token(), Some(block_expr.into()))
},
ast::ClosureExpr(closure) => hl(closure.async_token(), closure.body()),
_ => continue,
}