internal: Use assoc items as anchors for spans

This commit is contained in:
Lukas Wirth 2024-03-15 09:28:39 +01:00
parent d085ade631
commit c50c4f8bbb
4 changed files with 74 additions and 17 deletions

View file

@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
//! Span maps for real files and macro expansions.
use span::{FileId, HirFileId, HirFileIdRepr, MacroFileId, Span, SyntaxContextId};
use syntax::{AstNode, TextRange};
use stdx::TupleExt;
use syntax::{ast, AstNode, TextRange};
use triomphe::Arc;
pub use span::RealSpanMap;
use crate::db::ExpandDatabase;
use crate::{attrs::collect_attrs, db::ExpandDatabase};
pub type ExpansionSpanMap = span::SpanMap<SyntaxContextId>;
@ -83,13 +84,54 @@ pub(crate) fn real_span_map(db: &dyn ExpandDatabase, file_id: FileId) -> Arc<Rea
let mut pairs = vec![(syntax::TextSize::new(0), span::ROOT_ERASED_FILE_AST_ID)];
let ast_id_map = db.ast_id_map(file_id.into());
let tree = db.parse(file_id).tree();
// FIXME: Descend into modules and other item containing items that are not annotated with attributes
// and allocate pairs for those as well. This gives us finer grained span anchors resulting in
// better incrementality
pairs.extend(
tree.items()
.map(|item| (item.syntax().text_range().start(), ast_id_map.ast_id(&item).erase())),
);
// This is an incrementality layer. Basically we can't use absolute ranges for our spans as that
// would mean we'd invalidate everything whenever we type. So instead we make the text ranges
// relative to some AstIds reducing the risk of invalidation as typing somewhere no longer
// affects all following spans in the file.
// There is some stuff to bear in mind here though, for one, the more "anchors" we create, the
// easier it gets to invalidate things again as spans are as stable as their anchor's ID.
// The other problem is proc-macros. Proc-macros have a `Span::join` api that allows them
// to join two spans that come from the same file. rust-analyzer's proc-macro server
// can only join two spans if they belong to the same anchor though, as the spans are relative
// to that anchor. To do cross anchor joining we'd need to access to the ast id map to resolve
// them again, something we might get access to in the future. But even then, proc-macros doing
// this kind of joining makes them as stable as the AstIdMap (which is basically changing on
// every input of the file)…
let item_to_entry =
|item: ast::Item| (item.syntax().text_range().start(), ast_id_map.ast_id(&item).erase());
// Top level items make for great anchors as they are the most stable and a decent boundary
pairs.extend(tree.items().map(item_to_entry));
// Unfortunately, assoc items are very common in Rust, so descend into those as well and make
// them anchors too, but only if they have no attributes attached, as those might be proc-macros
// and using different anchors inside of them will prevent spans from being joinable.
tree.items().for_each(|item| match &item {
ast::Item::ExternBlock(it)
if !collect_attrs(it).map(TupleExt::tail).any(|it| it.is_left()) =>
{
if let Some(extern_item_list) = it.extern_item_list() {
pairs.extend(
extern_item_list.extern_items().map(ast::Item::from).map(item_to_entry),
);
}
}
ast::Item::Impl(it) if !collect_attrs(it).map(TupleExt::tail).any(|it| it.is_left()) => {
if let Some(assoc_item_list) = it.assoc_item_list() {
pairs.extend(assoc_item_list.assoc_items().map(ast::Item::from).map(item_to_entry));
}
}
ast::Item::Module(it) if !collect_attrs(it).map(TupleExt::tail).any(|it| it.is_left()) => {
if let Some(item_list) = it.item_list() {
pairs.extend(item_list.items().map(item_to_entry));
}
}
ast::Item::Trait(it) if !collect_attrs(it).map(TupleExt::tail).any(|it| it.is_left()) => {
if let Some(assoc_item_list) = it.assoc_item_list() {
pairs.extend(assoc_item_list.assoc_items().map(ast::Item::from).map(item_to_entry));
}
}
_ => (),
});
Arc::new(RealSpanMap::from_file(
file_id,