When viewing traces, it's slightly confusing when the span name doesn't
match the function name. Ensure the names are consistent.
(It might be worth moving most of these to use #[tracing::instrument]
so the name can never go stale. @davidbarsky suggested that is marginally
slower, so I've just done the simple change here.)
Add more methods for resolving definitions from AST to their corresponding HIR types
In order to be able to add these methods with consistent naming I had to also rename two existing methods that would otherwise be conflicting/confusing:
`Semantics::to_module_def(&self, file: FileId) -> Option<Module>` (before)
`Semantics::file_to_module_def(&self, file: FileId) -> Option<Module>` (after)
`Semantics::to_module_defs(&self, file: FileId) -> impl Iterator<Item = Module>` (before)
`Semantics::file_to_module_defs(&self, file: FileId) -> impl Iterator<Item = Module>` (after)
(the PR is motivated by an outside use of the `ra_ap_hir` crate that would benefit from being able to walk a `hir::Function`'s AST, resolving its exprs/stmts/items to their HIR equivalents)
This commit also adds `tracing` to NotificationDispatcher/RequestDispatcher,
bumps `rust-analyzer-salsa` to 0.17.0-pre.6, `always-assert` to 0.2, and
removes the homegrown `hprof` implementation in favor of a vendored
tracing-span-tree.
fix: rewrite code_action `generate_delegate_trait`
I've made substantial enhancements to the "generate delegate trait" code action in rust-analyzer. Here's a summary of the changes:
#### Resolved the "Can’t find CONST_ARG@158..159 in AstIdMap" error
Fix#15804, fix#15968, fix#15108
The issue stemmed from an incorrect application of PathTransform in the original code. Previously, a new 'impl' was generated first and then transformed, causing PathTransform to fail in locating the correct AST node, resulting in an error. I rectified this by performing the transformation before generating the new 'impl' (using make::impl_trait), ensuring a step-by-step transformation of associated items.
#### Rectified generation of `Self` type
`generate_delegate_trait` is unable to properly handle trait with `Self` type.
Let's take the following code as an example:
```rust
trait Trait {
fn f() -> Self;
}
struct B {}
impl Trait for B {
fn f() -> B { B{} }
}
struct S {
b: B,
}
```
Here, if we implement `Trait` for `S`, the type of `f` should be `() -> Self`, i.e. `() -> S`. However we cannot automatically generate a function that constructs `S`.
To ensure that the code action doesn't generate delegate traits for traits with Self types, I add a function named `has_self_type` to handle it.
#### Extended support for generics in structs and fields within this code action
The former version of `generate_delegate_trait` cannot handle structs with generics properly. Here's an example:
```rust
struct B<T> {
a: T
}
trait Trait<T> {
fn f(a: T);
}
impl<T1, T2> Trait<T1> for B<T2> {
fn f(a: T1) -> T2 { self.a }
}
struct A {}
struct S {
b$0 : B<A>,
}
```
The former version will generates improper code:
```rust
impl<T1, T2> Trait<T1, T2> for S {
fn f(&self, a: T1) -> T1 {
<B as Trait<T1, T2>>::f( &self.b , a)
}
}
```
The rewritten version can handle generics properly:
```rust
impl<T1> Trait<T1> for S {
fn f(&self, a: T1) -> T1 {
<B<A> as Trait<T1>>::f(&self.b, a)
}
}
```
See more examples in added unit tests.
I enabled support for generic structs in `generate_delegate_trait` through the following steps (using the code example provided):
1. Initially, to prevent conflicts between the generic parameters in struct `S` and the ones in the impl of `B`, I renamed the generic parameters of `S`.
2. Then, since `B`'s parameters are instantiated within `S`, the original generic parameters of `B` needed removal within `S` (to avoid errors from redundant parameters). An important consideration here arises when Trait and B share parameters in `B`'s impl. In such cases, these shared generic parameters cannot be removed.
3. Next, I addressed the matching of types between `B`'s type in `S` and its type in the impl. Given that some generic parameters in the impl are instantiated in `B`, I replaced these parameters with their instantiated results using PathTransform. For instance, in the example provided, matching `B<A>` and `B<T2>`, where `T2` is instantiated as `A`, I replaced all occurrences of `T2` in the impl with `A` (i.e. apply the instantiated generic arguments to the params).
4. Finally, I performed transformations on each assoc item (also to prevent the initial issue) and handled redundant where clauses.
For a more detailed explanation, please refer to the code and comments. I welcome suggestions and any further questions!
