Now that they're const it's no longer needed.
Nothing manual was performed: only a regexp search of `sym::([\w][\w\d]*)\.clone\(\)` and replace by `sym::$1`.
And make more queries non-interned.
Also flip the default for queries, now the default is to not intern and to intern a query you need to say `invoke_interned`.
this makes three changes:
- all callsites of `toolchain::command` are changed to use
`command(path, extra_env)`, instead of manually adding the env after
the fact.
- all `map<str, str>` are changed to `map<str, option<str>>`.
- `command` checks for None and calls `env_remove` if so.
this caught several places where environment variables weren't being
propagated:
- when running `rustc --print=target-libdir`
- when running `cargo rustc -- --print=target-spec-json`
- when running the custom DiscoverLinkedProjects config. I *think* this
is for use with non-cargo build systems, so I didn't change it.
previously, these would just silently be ignored. now they give a
warning such as:
```
invalid config values: /completion/snippets/custom: invalid type: null, expected a map; /cargo/extraEnv: invalid type: null, expected a string;
```
Previously it was ordered by what accidentally happened to be the crate graph order, which isn't sensible, plus it caused changes when any change was done to salsa IDs.
That is, all queries that have a `with_diagnostic` variant.
Them being tracked was (maybe) needed before #19462, because back then diagnostics could refer `AstId`s (for macro types), but now they are no longer needed.
Stabilize `cfg_boolean_literals`
Closes#131204
`@rustbot` labels +T-lang +I-lang-nominated
This will end up conflicting with the test in #138293 so whichever doesn't land first will need updating
--
# Stabilization Report
## General design
### What is the RFC for this feature and what changes have occurred to the user-facing design since the RFC was finalized?
[RFC 3695](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3695), none.
### What behavior are we committing to that has been controversial? Summarize the major arguments pro/con.
None
### Are there extensions to this feature that remain unstable? How do we know that we are not accidentally committing to those?
None
## Has a call-for-testing period been conducted? If so, what feedback was received?
Yes; only positive feedback was received.
## Implementation quality
### Summarize the major parts of the implementation and provide links into the code (or to PRs)
Implemented in [#131034](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131034).
### Summarize existing test coverage of this feature
- [Basic usage, including `#[cfg()]`, `cfg!()` and `#[cfg_attr()]`](6d71251cf9/tests/ui/cfg/true-false.rs)
- [`--cfg=true/false` on the command line being accessible via `r#true/r#false`](6d71251cf9/tests/ui/cfg/raw-true-false.rs)
- [Interaction with the unstable `#[doc(cfg(..))]` feature](6d71251/tests/rustdoc-ui/cfg-boolean-literal.rs)
- [Denying `--check-cfg=cfg(true/false)`](6d71251/tests/ui/check-cfg/invalid-arguments.rs)
- Ensuring `--cfg false` on the command line doesn't change the meaning of `cfg(false)`: `tests/ui/cfg/cmdline-false.rs`
- Ensuring both `cfg(true)` and `cfg(false)` on the same item result in it being disabled: `tests/ui/cfg/both-true-false.rs`
### What outstanding bugs in the issue tracker involve this feature? Are they stabilization-blocking?
The above mentioned issue; it should not block as it interacts with another unstable feature.
### What FIXMEs are still in the code for that feature and why is it ok to leave them there?
None
### Summarize contributors to the feature by name for recognition and assuredness that people involved in the feature agree with stabilization
- `@clubby789` (RFC)
- `@Urgau` (Implementation in rustc)
### Which tools need to be adjusted to support this feature. Has this work been done?
`rustdoc`'s unstable`#[doc(cfg(..)]` has been updated to respect it. `cargo` has been updated with a forward compatibility lint to enable supporting it in cargo once stabilized.
## Type system and execution rules
### What updates are needed to the reference/specification? (link to PRs when they exist)
A few lines to be added to the reference for configuration predicates, specified in the RFC.
