3 commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Aleksey Kladov	2bf81922f7	internal: more reasonable grammar for blocks ... Consider these expples { 92 } async { 92 } 'a: { 92 } #[a] { 92 } Previously the tree for them were BLOCK_EXPR { ... } EFFECT_EXPR async BLOCK_EXPR { ... } EFFECT_EXPR 'a: BLOCK_EXPR { ... } BLOCK_EXPR #[a] { ... } As you see, it gets progressively worse :) The last two items are especially odd. The last one even violates the balanced curleys invariant we have (#10357) The new approach is to say that the stuff in `{}` is stmt_list, and the block is stmt_list + optional modifiers BLOCK_EXPR STMT_LIST { ... } BLOCK_EXPR async STMT_LIST { ... } BLOCK_EXPR 'a: STMT_LIST { ... } BLOCK_EXPR #[a] STMT_LIST { ... }	2021-09-26 19:16:09 +03:00
Jonas Schievink	1d6eef1350	Update ungrammar	2021-06-11 18:34:30 +02:00
Aleksey Kladov	a1c187eef3	Rename ra_syntax -> syntax	2020-08-12 18:30:53 +02:00

Renamed from crates/ra_syntax/test_data/parser/err/0005_attribute_recover.rast (Browse further)