Remove special-casing for argument patterns in MIR typeck (attempt to fix perf regression of #133858)
See [my comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133858#issuecomment-2579029618) on #133858 for more information. This is just a guess as to what went wrong, and I haven't been able to get the profiler running locally, so I'll need a perf run to make sure this actually helps.
There's one test's stderr that suffers a bit, but this was just papering over the issue anyway. Making region errors point to the correct constraints in the presence of invariance/contravariance is a broader problem; the current way it's handled is mostly based on guesswork, luck, and hoping it works out. Properly handling that (somehow) would improve the test's stderr without the hack that this PR reverts.
Make sure to walk into nested const blocks in `RegionResolutionVisitor`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135306
I tried auditing the rest of the visitors that called `.visit_body`, and it seems like this is the only one that was missing it. I wonder if we should modify intravisit (specifcially, that `NestedBodyFilter` stuff) to make this less likely to happen, tho...
r? oli-obk
Make `bare-fn-no-impl-fn-ptr-99875` test less dependent on path width
This sets diagnostic-width to some arbitrary number. Seems to work on my machine.
Fix `ptr::from_ref` documentation example comment
The comment says that the expression involves no function call, but that was only true for the example above, the example here _does_ contain a function call.
``@rustbot`` label A-docs
Improve prose around `as_slice` example of IterMut
I've removed the cryptic message about not being able to call `&mut self` methods while retaining a shared borrow of the iterator, such as `as_slice` produces. This is just normal borrowing rules and does not seem especially relevant here. I can whip up a replacement if someone thinks it has value.
`-Zrandomize-layout` harder. `Foo<T> != Foo<U>`
Tracking issue: #106764
Previously randomize-layout only used a deterministic shuffle based on the seed stored in an Adt's ReprOptions, meaning that `Foo<T>` and `Foo<U>` were shuffled by the same seed. This change adds a similar seed to each calculated LayoutData so that a struct can be randomized both based on the layout of its fields and its per-type seed.
Primitives start with simple seed derived from some of their properties. Though some types can no longer be distinguished at that point, e.g. usize and u64 will still be treated the same.
And not just called to be listed.
This was a major performance hang when repeatedly switching back-and-forth between a large `include!`d file (but there are others)..
More correctly, *also* per-token. Because as it turns out, while the top-level edition affects parsing (I think), the per-token edition affects escaping of identifiers/keywords.
It should be left biased, not right biased, because when e.g. the use has typed `h` then requested completion, the `h` is what we want to find, not the next token (which might indeed be inside a macro call).
I'm not sure why I wrote `right_biased()` to begin with (I remember I had a reason and not just "both should work"), I might've copied the code in `expand_and_analyze()` (which is wrong, because there it lookups on the speculative file, where right biased will always find the correct token and left biased not).
This is still not perfect, because there might not be an identifier already typed then we might still end up in a macro call, but this is the best we can do.
`best_blame_constraint`: Blame better constraints when the region graph has cycles from invariance or `'static`
This fixes#132749 by changing which constraint is blamed for region errors in several cases. `best_blame_constraint` had a heuristic that tried to pinpoint the constraint causing an error by filtering out any constraints where the outliving region is unified with the ultimate target region being outlived. However, it used the SCCs of the region graph to do this, which is unreliable; in particular, if the target region is `'static`, or if there are cycles from the presence of invariant types, it was skipping over the constraints it should be blaming. As is the case in that issue, this could lead to confusing diagnostics. The simplest fix seems to work decently, judging by test stderr: this makes `best_blame_constraint` no longer filter constraints by their outliving region's SCC.
There are admittedly some quirks in the test output. In many cases, subdiagnostics that depend on the particular constraint being blamed have either started or stopped being emitted. After starting at this for quite a while, I think anything too fickle about whether it outputs based on the particular constraint being blamed should instead be looking at the constraint path as a whole, similar to what's done for [the placeholder-from-predicate note](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...dianne:rust:better-blame-constraints-for-static#diff-3c0de6462469af483c9ecdf2c4b00cb26192218ef2d5c62a0fde75107a74caaeR506).
Very many tests involving invariant types gained a note pointing out the types' invariance, but in a few cases it was lost. A particularly illustrative example is [tests/ui/lifetimes/copy_modulo_regions.stderr](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...dianne:rust:better-blame-constraints-for-static?expand=1#diff-96e1f8b29789b3c4ce2f77a5e0fba248829b97ef9d1ce39e7d2b4aa57b2cf4f0); I'd argue the new constraint is a better one to blame, but it lacks the variance diagnostic information that's elsewhere in the constraint path. If desired, I can try making that note check the whole path rather than just the blamed constraint.
The subdiagnostic [`BorrowExplanation::add_object_lifetime_default_note`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_borrowck/diagnostics/explain_borrow/enum.BorrowExplanation.html#method.add_object_lifetime_default_note) depends on a `Cast` being blamed, so [a special case](364ca7f99c) was necessary to keep it from disappearing from tests specifically testing for it. However, see the FIXME comment in that commit; I think the special case should be removed once that subdiagnostic works properly, but it's nontrivial enough to warrant a separate PR. Incidentally, this removes the note from a test where it was being added erroneously: in [tests/ui/borrowck/two-phase-surprise-no-conflict.stderr](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...dianne:rust:better-blame-constraints-for-static?expand=1#diff-8cf085af8203677de6575a45458c9e6b03412a927df879412adec7e4f7ff5e14), the object lifetime is explicitly provided and it's not `'static`.
