1928: Support `#[cfg(..)]` r=matklad a=oxalica
This PR implement `#[cfg(..)]` conditional compilation. It read default cfg options from `rustc --print cfg` with also hard-coded `test` and `debug_assertion` enabled.
Front-end settings are **not** included in this PR.
There is also a known issue that inner control attributes are totally ignored. I think it is **not** a part of `cfg` and create a separated issue for it. #1949Fixes#1920
Related: #1073
Co-authored-by: uHOOCCOOHu <hooccooh1896@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: oxalica <oxalicc@pm.me>
Forbidding block expressions entirely is too strict; instead, we should only
forbid them in contexts where we are parsing an optional RHS (i.e. the RHS of a
range expression).
1743: Support `#[macro_use]` on `extern crate` r=matklad a=uHOOCCOOHu
Unfortunately, #1688 is still an issue. My guess is wrong :(
Co-authored-by: uHOOCCOOHu <hooccooh1896@gmail.com>
1208: [WIP] Goto for Macro's r=matklad a=Lapz
Adds goto definition for macros. Currently only works for macros in the current crate ~~otherwise it panics~~. Proper macro resolution needs to be added for it to resolve macros in other crates.
Todo
- [X] Allow goto from macro calls
- [X] Fix panics
- [x] Add tests
Co-authored-by: Lenard Pratt <l3np27@gmail.com>
1154: Initial support for lang items (and str completion) r=flodiebold a=marcogroppo
This PR adds partial support for lang items.
For now, the only supported lang items are the ones that target an impl block.
Lang items are now resolved during type inference - this means that `str` completion now works.
Fixes#1139.
(thanks Florian Diebold for the help!)
Co-authored-by: Marco Groppo <marco.groppo@gmail.com>
1076: Const body inference r=flodiebold a=Lapz
This is the second part of #887. I've added type inference on const bodies and introduced the DefWithBody containing Function, Const and Static. I want to add tests but im unsure on how I would go about testing that completions work.
Co-authored-by: Lenard Pratt <l3np27@gmail.com>
These are now used when parsing type bounds. In addition parsing paths inside a
bound now does not recursively parse paths, rather they are treated as separate
bounds, separated by +.
