Commit graph

147 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jonas Schievink
ed48bd8b9d Fix parsing of _ = x in closure body 2022-12-12 12:57:29 +01:00
Chayim Refael Friedman
d786a40e73 Parse TypePathFn with preceding ::
e.g. `impl Fn::() -> ()`.
2022-08-31 23:19:09 +00:00
Jonas Schievink
8969655ed6 Allow leading | in more pattern positions 2022-08-23 16:31:59 +02:00
Lukas Wirth
49d24f639f Recover from missing ellipsis in record literals for path expressions 2022-08-09 18:23:25 +02:00
Ryo Yoshida
b14062aaec
Parse range patterns in let statement with type annotation 2022-08-09 00:00:22 +09:00
Ryo Yoshida
a81c7a2974
Parse range patterns in struct and slice without trailing comma 2022-08-07 17:19:15 +09:00
cynecx
902fd6ddcd fix: complete path of existing record expr 2022-07-29 17:24:05 +02:00
Amos Wenger
7e285e1ef5 Run cargo fmt 2022-07-20 15:06:15 +02:00
Amos Wenger
816f7fe12a Run cargo fix --edition-idioms 2022-07-20 15:02:08 +02:00
XFFXFF
df67bbdcb3 fix: parsing of ? opt-out trait bounds
thanks to Veykril
2022-06-02 21:30:18 +08:00
Jonas Schievink
9bd11459ba Revert "Auto merge of #12149 - jonas-schievink:literally-just-a-literal, r=jonas-schievink"
This reverts commit cc9ae2b89e, reversing
changes made to 7dfd1cb572.
2022-05-13 15:08:14 +02:00
Jonas Schievink
37443eb9a1 Maybe everything else *should* have to deal with it 2022-05-05 16:28:59 +02:00
Jonas Schievink
2fe38d3b63 Indicate the number of float tokens in the first token 2022-05-05 16:28:59 +02:00
Jonas Schievink
34dc8e9383 Wrap floats in token trees in FLOAT_LITERAL node 2022-05-05 16:28:59 +02:00
Jonas Schievink
2a755495d0 Add tests 2022-05-05 16:28:59 +02:00
Jonas Schievink
1bc3305d95 Split float literal tokens at the . 2022-05-05 16:28:58 +02:00
Jonas Schievink
502c519e7d Wrap float literals in their own node 2022-05-05 16:28:14 +02:00
Lukas Wirth
e2344e78f3 fix: Use pattern recovery set when parsing ident patterns 2022-04-27 19:08:50 +02:00
XFFXFF
6580d75308 update parser to support associated const equality 2022-04-17 20:26:06 +08:00
Lukas Wirth
d8341c5b92 Parse for<'a> closure syntax 2022-04-10 17:50:14 +02:00
Jonas Schievink
872b7b9660 Wrap macros in expr position in MacroExpr node 2022-04-05 17:43:34 +02:00
hkalbasi
049f0a6d2c recover from missing type annotation 2022-04-01 17:20:54 +04:30
Jonas Schievink
42ecf406e8 Remove parser restriction on varargs positioning 2022-03-31 16:03:27 +02:00
Steven Joruk
8a28430676 refactor: Rename and move const_arg_path
It wasn't testing the `const_arg` code path, it was actually hitting
const_param's default value code path, so move it to the right place
and rename it.
2022-03-11 22:28:38 +00:00
Steven Joruk
e84453c47f refactor: Rename const_arg_content to const_arg_expr 2022-03-11 22:28:35 +00:00
Steven Joruk
972f50da2d fix: Stop wrapping ConstParam's default values in ConstArg
This was causing ConstParam::default_val to always return None for block
expressions.

CONST_ARG@24..29
  BLOCK_EXPR@24..29
    ...
2022-03-11 19:51:35 +00:00
Dario Nieuwenhuis
49d1207775 Add support for new where clause location in associated types.
A recent Rust nightly changed it: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89122

This allows both the old and new location.
2022-03-10 18:21:29 +01:00
Lukas Wirth
c0d6471143 fix: Recognize Self as a proper keyword 2022-03-05 23:20:06 +01:00
Chayim Refael Friedman
d9f0731bd2 Parse destructuring assignment
The only patterns we should parse are `..` in structs and `_`: the rest are either not supported or already valid expressions.
2022-03-02 01:51:25 +00:00
Chayim Refael Friedman
de8633f15f Parse let expressions in order to support let chains
We still need to reject freestanding `let` expressions: see https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/11320#issuecomment-1018212465.
2022-02-21 08:34:34 +02:00
bellau
06452cd102 Fix style 2022-02-14 07:41:50 +01:00
bellau
dc68b89469 oops, remove println 2022-02-13 09:11:35 +01:00
bellau
0a18a050b5 fix handle static async and static async move 2022-02-13 09:09:44 +01:00
bellau
3ed19d54db Fix style 2022-02-12 17:31:17 +01:00
bellau
2008607946 support static move too 2022-02-12 16:07:58 +01:00
bellau
1284bc0af3 Fix styles 2022-02-12 15:35:06 +01:00
bellau
ccab6afabc Fix Immovable generator syntax (static ||) not recognized #11448 2022-02-12 15:17:10 +01:00
Aleksey Kladov
b5369927d7 parse empty statemet as statemetn 2021-12-29 20:04:36 +03:00
Aleksey Kladov
f5cfc0504e rename 2021-12-29 19:18:34 +03:00
Aleksey Kladov
8234a85d15 compress 2021-12-29 18:51:05 +03:00
Aleksey Kladov
b360ea91f2 internal: move inline parser tests to parser crate 2021-12-26 18:19:09 +03:00
Aleksey Kladov
26bfd6023f Switch parser to use tokens 2021-12-12 16:54:09 +03:00
zhoufan
a539b5e693 fix: parse the range pat inside the tuple pat 2021-11-18 11:11:37 +08:00
Adam Bratschi-Kaye
0d54754ca7 Handle pub tuple fields in tuple structs
The current implementation will throw a parser error for tuple structs
that contain a pub tuple field. For example,
```rust
struct Foo(pub (u32, u32));
```
is valid Rust, but rust-analyzer will throw a parser error.  This is
because the parens after `pub` is treated as a visibility context.
Allowing a tuple type to follow `pub` in the special case when we are
defining fields in a tuple struct can fix the issue.
2021-11-10 21:29:50 +01:00
Aleksey Kladov
485c5e6717 internal: remove unused dollars 2021-10-23 20:44:35 +03:00
Lukas Wirth
b219a4c465 internal: Parse const trait bounds 2021-10-19 14:20:00 +02:00
Jonas Schievink
f8acae7895 Support let...else 2021-10-07 17:06:24 +02:00
cynecx
07cd19dcef parser: fix parsing of macro call inside generic args 2021-10-06 22:41:35 +02:00
bors[bot]
94fa49c0a3
Merge #10420
10420: Parse outer attributes on StructPatternEtCetera r=jonas-schievink a=XFFXFF

Try to fix https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/8610  
Related pr in ungrammer: https://github.com/rust-analyzer/ungrammar/pull/41

Co-authored-by: zhoufan <1247714429@qq.com>
2021-10-06 15:05:40 +00:00
bors[bot]
86c534f244
Merge #10440
10440: Fix Clippy warnings and replace some `if let`s with `match` r=Veykril a=arzg

I decided to try fixing a bunch of Clippy warnings. I am aware of this project’s opinion of Clippy (I have read both [rust-lang/clippy#5537](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/5537) and [rust-analyzer/rowan#57 (comment)](https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rowan/pull/57#discussion_r415676159)), so I totally understand if part of or the entirety of this PR is rejected. In particular, I can see how the semicolons and `if let` vs `match` commits provide comparatively little benefit when compared to the ensuing churn.

I tried to separate each kind of change into its own commit to make it easier to discard certain changes. I also only applied Clippy suggestions where I thought they provided a definite improvement to the code (apart from semicolons, which is IMO more of a formatting/consistency question than a linting question). In the end I accumulated a list of 28 Clippy lints I ignored entirely.

Sidenote: I should really have asked about this on Zulip before going through all 1,555 `if let`s in the codebase to decide which ones definitely look better as `match` :P

Co-authored-by: Aramis Razzaghipour <aramisnoah@gmail.com>
2021-10-05 08:58:40 +00:00