... so that we have one that controls the embedding operation and one
that we can turn into a dynamic tree node where the actual embedding
happens.
Mark the placeholder Element as `is_component_placeholder` and make sure to not
optimize out that object in a later pass.
Adapt Element creation to account for the new
`is_component_placeholder`.
This should in principle not be allowed, it should be relative to the
file itself.
Make it a warning, and at least, don't duplicate the globals
Fixes#2719
Fixes#3085
When there are both a binding and a two way binding, we must keep the
two way binding in our bindings map. Otherwise type inference will not
work
This improve the code coverage of syntax_text, so some adjustment had to
be made.
This may add more error in the main file, but this make it the same
behavior as for imported files and lsp who were already running these
passes all the time
In Rust, register_component in the run-time library is called unconditionally and
invokes init(). The window adapter is an optional
parameter.
In C++, we'd call register_component only if we had a window adapter, which meant
that we're missing init calls().
Amends cd9994306e
... if they are not set as actual binding before
As reported in #3068
The problem is that the pass will properly create the Rotation or
Opacity item, but will not create the two way binding if there is no
existing binding. This causes code like `img.rotation-angle = ...` to
change the rotation angle of the image, but not its parent Rotation
item.
Fix it by making sure there is always a binding.
Since the change only affect visual representation, I abused one of the
screenshot test to test this feature. And I also patched another bug
that some #[allow(unused_parens)] was not set in the 'init' callback and
would cause a warning in the test
using `use slint::private_unstable_api::re_exports as sp;` should
allow to safely qualify everything will keeping things shorter.
For the `todo` example:
- before 1_050_650 octets for 24_012 formatted lines
- after 934_049 octets for 23_032 formatted lines
This also makes the generated code more readable if needed.
cc #2909 , #223
New message:
```
/home/olivier/slint/build2/examples/gallery/gallery.h:6:73: error: static assertion failed: This file was generated with Slint compiler version 1.1.1, but the Slint library used is 1.1.0. The version numbers must match exactly.
6 | static_assert(1 == SLINT_VERSION_MAJOR && 1 == SLINT_VERSION_MINOR && 1 == SLINT_VERSION_PATCH, "This file was generated with Slint compiler version 1.1.1, but the Slint library used is " SLINT_VERSION_STRING ". The version numbers must match exactly.");
/home/olivier/slint/build2/examples/gallery/gallery.h:6:73: note: the comparison reduces to ‘(1 == 0)’
```
Previous message:
```
/home/olivier/slint/build2/examples/printerdemo/cpp/printerdemo.h:12218:161: error: conversion from ‘VersionCheckHelper<[...],[...],0>’ to non-scalar type ‘VersionCheckHelper<[...],[...],1>’ requested
12218 | [[maybe_unused]] constexpr slint::private_api::VersionCheckHelper<1, 1, 1> THE_SAME_VERSION_MUST_BE_USED_FOR_THE_COMPILER_AND_THE_RUNTIME = slint::private_api::VersionCheckHelper<SLINT_VERSION_MAJOR, SLINT_VERSION_MINOR, SLINT_VERSION_PATCH>();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/olivier/slint/build2/examples/printerdemo/cpp/printerdemo.h:12218:161: error: could not convert ‘slint::private_api::VersionCheckHelper<1, 1, 0>()’ from ‘VersionCheckHelper<[...],[...],0>’ to ‘VersionCheckHelper<[...],[...],1>’
12218 | [[maybe_unused]] constexpr slint::private_api::VersionCheckHelper<1, 1, 1> THE_SAME_VERSION_MUST_BE_USED_FOR_THE_COMPILER_AND_THE_RUNTIME = slint::private_api::VersionCheckHelper<SLINT_VERSION_MAJOR, SLINT_VERSION_MINOR, SLINT_VERSION_PATCH>();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| VersionCheckHelper<[...],[...],0>
```
Fixes#2977
The problem is that expressions such as "foo * foo" can be optimized by
optimization pass to only query the property once, and this is
transformed in a Expression::CodeBlock and is no longer a
Expression::Cast(Model)
So we need to introspect the expression more.
