When converting a ModelRc<T> to a Value, the resulting model did not
implement set_row_data and therefore would not allow changing the model
from the code.
By adding a `TryFrom` bound, we can make sure set_row_data is
implemented.
This is technically a breaking change to add this bound, but most type
that implement From for value also implement TryFrom<Value>
These conversion function were added in
20443ec0df for Slint 1.9
ChangeLog: interpreter: The `From<ModelRc> for slint_interpreter::Value` now gives a model that supports `set_row_data`.
Updated the version from 1.1 to 1.2
Renamed the header to "Slint Royalty-free Desktop, Mobile, and Web Applications License"
Added definition of "Mobile Application" and grant of right
Moved "Limitations" to 3rd section and "License Conditions - Attributions" to 2nd section
Added flexibility to choose between showing "MadeWithSlint" as a dialog/splash screen or on a public webpage
Moved the para on copyright notices to section under "Limitations"
This fixes a couple of bug:
- Bug #3740 happens because `Repeater::model_set_row_data` did not use
the inner.offset to get the instance (So that's the `val == 106` part
of the test)
- But I went ahead and also tested what happenned if you changed the
model from the "outside" using the `model[i] = `, and that was not
implemented, hence the move of the code from
`Repeater::model_set_row_data` to `RepeaterTracker::row_changed`,
That does need Pin though, so Pin was added everywhere
- C++ is not affected by bug #3740, because because the C++ listview
don't do the "allocate only visible" optimization. But the
"val == 1106" part of the test would fail so this patch also moces
the update from `model_set_row_data` to `row_changed`.
But following that we don't set the state as Dirty in `row_changed`,
the write_to_model test started filling because the `row_added`
function was missing an update of the index on every further items
The change in the interpreter prevent a borrow_mut from causing trouble.
The Value really don't need to be in a RefCell anyway
Fix#3740
Make sure that we return an unsigned for row_count() in C++ and Rust by ensuring an unsigned int model at creation time.
For the interpreter this "worked" by chance as casting a negative floating
number to usize automatically caps at zero, and all values are stored as f64. For safety this patch
applies the same fix though, to be on the safe side.
The README.md contains the warning that used to be in lib.rs.
Add README.md files to all internal crates
... pointing to the official public crate to use instead.
Rename internal crates
fixup: README files
fixup rename
Move "internal" crates into the `internal` directory. This first batch
includes most of sixtyfps_runtime but leaves the rendering backends
alone for now.
pre-commit applied some cleanups to the moved files:
- Consistent newline at end of file policy
- trimming trailing whitespace
- Formatting Cargo.toml files.
2022-01-31 16:00:50 +01:00
Renamed from sixtyfps_runtime/interpreter/value_model.rs (Browse further)
