Fixes#4741
This commit move the property_binding_and_analysis from the inlining
pass to an associated funciton in the context.
Then re-use that from the rust and c++ generator to actually get the
right animation
```
error: casting references to a bigger memory layout than the backing allocation is undefined behavior, even if the reference is unused
--> internal/core/item_tree.rs:1035:32
|
1035 | Pin::new_unchecked(&*(&**component as *const Dyn as *const u8)),
| ^^^^-----------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| |
| backing allocation comes from here
|
= note: casting from `vtable::Dyn` (0 bytes) to `u8` (1 bytes)
= note: `#[deny(invalid_reference_casting)]` on by default
```
This changes the component containers away from using a "MAGIC" index in the
placeholder dynamic item tree node it creates. These are hard to
integrate across sub-components.
Use index numbers right after the index numbers used by repeaters and
"extend" the repeater offset by the number of component containers in
the sub-component. This way we can piggy-back on the forwarding of
repeaters.
This has one annoying side-effect: We do have indices in our item tree
that are out of range for a repeater. But I think that is acceptable
considering that we never materialize that array anyway.
For the backend selector, this means that when a backend is selected explicitly,
and initialization fails, don't try `create_default_backend()` but
propagate the error.
For the Rust code generator, propagate the first ensure_backend()
errors. Any subsequent onces (unlikely, since the first thing any
public new() calls is ensure_backend) will unwrap.
In `ItemRc::find_sibling` we currently do:
1. get the range
2. check that the next index is within the range
3. call `get_subtree`
The problem is that get_subtree itselg will call 'ensure_updated' which
will do the relayout of the ListView and may get a different range of
element.
So don't query the range before and just have get_subtree to return an
empty ItemWeak if we are out of the actual range.
Couldn't really find a way to make a test since this is called from
the accessibility code which is hard to test as is
For #3700
Warning looks like that
```
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Enterprise\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32215\include\tuple(144,47): warning C4244: 'initializing': conversion from '_Ty' to '_Ty', possible loss of data [D:\a\slint\cppbuild\examples\virtual_keyboard\cpp\virtual_keyboard.vcxproj]
with
[
_Ty=int
]
and
[
_Ty=float
]
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Enterprise\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32215\include\tuple(239): message : see reference to function template instantiation 'std::_Tuple_val<_This>::_Tuple_val<_Ty>(_Other &&)' being compiled [D:\a\slint\cppbuild\examples\virtual_keyboard\cpp\virtual_keyboard.vcxproj]
with
[
_This=float,
_Ty=int,
_Other=int
]
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Enterprise\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32215\include\tuple(239,81): message : see reference to function template instantiation 'std::_Tuple_val<_This>::_Tuple_val<_Ty>(_Other &&)' being compiled [D:\a\slint\cppbuild\examples\virtual_keyboard\cpp\virtual_keyboard.vcxproj]
with
[
_This=float,
_Ty=int,
_Other=int
]
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Enterprise\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32215\include\tuple(802): message : see reference to function template instantiation 'std::tuple<float,float,float,float>::tuple<std::_Exact_args_t,int,float,float,int,0>(_Tag,_This2 &&,float &&,float &&,int &&)' being compiled [D:\a\slint\cppbuild\examples\virtual_keyboard\cpp\virtual_keyboard.vcxproj]
with
[
_Tag=std::_Exact_args_t,
_This2=int
]
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Enterprise\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.35.32215\include\tuple(802,12): message : see reference to function template instantiation 'std::tuple<float,float,float,float>::tuple<std::_Exact_args_t,int,float,float,int,0>(_Tag,_This2 &&,float &&,float &&,int &&)' being compiled [D:\a\slint\cppbuild\examples\virtual_keyboard\cpp\virtual_keyboard.vcxproj]
with
[
_Tag=std::_Exact_args_t,
_This2=int
]
```
and their related name.
Also move the component module in the item_Tree module
register_component -> register_item_tree
ComponentItemTree -> ItemTreeNodeArray
For #3323
Rationale from that issue:
Right now, we use the term `component` in the Slint language and in the compiler to be a a tree of elements that can be used as an element in a .slint file.
The term is also currently used in the runtime as a tree of runtime Items that are allocated together. (declared in ComponentVTable)
But there are no 1 to 1 mapping between a `component` in the slint language, and a runtime Component.
(for example, the items behind a `if` or `for` or `PopupMenu` are in a different runtime component. And `component` declared in Slint are often inlined)
So we should rename the internal runtime `Component` to `ItemTree`
The currently public `slint::ComponentHandle` wraps the "root" of the ItemTree, but that's ok because it is generated from a .slint `component`, so it doesn't change name
The parent is already deleted when we delete the component that is kept
alive by the `grabber` ItemRc in `handle_mouse_grab`
When the ItemRc goes out of scope, we delete the component, but the
parent was already gone.
This doesn't solve a broader issue that we use the parent in many place
and it is not kept alive (for example when using properties of the
parent)
So it doesn't appear in the LLR and the C++ codegen can be simplified.
In particular, this removes the need to throw/catch exception to handle return
across generated lambdas
