Fix misleading mentions of tp_size in comments (GH-9093)

Many type object initializations labeled a field "tp_size" in the
comment, but the name of that field is tp_basicsize.
This commit is contained in:
Peter Eisentraut 2018-09-10 18:46:08 +02:00 committed by Benjamin Peterson
parent d545869d08
commit 0e0bc4e221
15 changed files with 21 additions and 21 deletions

View file

@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static PyMethodDef lock_methods[] = {
static PyTypeObject Locktype = {
PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT(&PyType_Type, 0)
"_thread.lock", /*tp_name*/
sizeof(lockobject), /*tp_size*/
sizeof(lockobject), /*tp_basicsize*/
0, /*tp_itemsize*/
/* methods */
(destructor)lock_dealloc, /*tp_dealloc*/
@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static PyMethodDef rlock_methods[] = {
static PyTypeObject RLocktype = {
PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT(&PyType_Type, 0)
"_thread.RLock", /*tp_name*/
sizeof(rlockobject), /*tp_size*/
sizeof(rlockobject), /*tp_basicsize*/
0, /*tp_itemsize*/
/* methods */
(destructor)rlock_dealloc, /*tp_dealloc*/