Fix misleading mentions of tp_size in comments (GH-9093)

Many type object initializations labeled a field "tp_size" in the
comment, but the name of that field is tp_basicsize.
This commit is contained in:
Peter Eisentraut 2018-09-10 18:46:08 +02:00 committed by Benjamin Peterson
parent d545869d08
commit 0e0bc4e221
15 changed files with 21 additions and 21 deletions

View file

@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ static PyMemberDef SHA_members[] = {
static PyTypeObject SHA224type = {
PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT(NULL, 0)
"_sha256.sha224", /*tp_name*/
sizeof(SHAobject), /*tp_size*/
sizeof(SHAobject), /*tp_basicsize*/
0, /*tp_itemsize*/
/* methods */
SHA_dealloc, /*tp_dealloc*/
@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ static PyTypeObject SHA224type = {
static PyTypeObject SHA256type = {
PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT(NULL, 0)
"_sha256.sha256", /*tp_name*/
sizeof(SHAobject), /*tp_size*/
sizeof(SHAobject), /*tp_basicsize*/
0, /*tp_itemsize*/
/* methods */
SHA_dealloc, /*tp_dealloc*/