Fix misleading mentions of tp_size in comments (GH-9093)

Many type object initializations labeled a field "tp_size" in the
comment, but the name of that field is tp_basicsize.
This commit is contained in:
Peter Eisentraut 2018-09-10 18:46:08 +02:00 committed by Benjamin Peterson
parent d545869d08
commit 0e0bc4e221
15 changed files with 21 additions and 21 deletions

View file

@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ bad_traverse_test(PyObject *self, void *arg) {
PyTypeObject PyModuleDef_Type = {
PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT(&PyType_Type, 0)
"moduledef", /* tp_name */
sizeof(struct PyModuleDef), /* tp_size */
sizeof(struct PyModuleDef), /* tp_basicsize */
0, /* tp_itemsize */
};
@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ static PyMethodDef module_methods[] = {
PyTypeObject PyModule_Type = {
PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT(&PyType_Type, 0)
"module", /* tp_name */
sizeof(PyModuleObject), /* tp_size */
sizeof(PyModuleObject), /* tp_basicsize */
0, /* tp_itemsize */
(destructor)module_dealloc, /* tp_dealloc */
0, /* tp_print */