mirror of
https://github.com/python/cpython.git
synced 2025-08-04 08:59:19 +00:00
x_mul(): Made life easier for C optimizers in the "grade school"
algorithm. MSVC 6 wasn't impressed <wink>. Something odd: the x_mul algorithm appears to get substantially worse than quadratic time as the inputs grow larger: bits in each input x_mul time k_mul time ------------------ ---------- ---------- 15360 0.01 0.00 30720 0.04 0.01 61440 0.16 0.04 122880 0.64 0.14 245760 2.56 0.40 491520 10.76 1.23 983040 71.28 3.69 1966080 459.31 11.07 That is, x_mul is perfectly quadratic-time until a little burp at 2.56->10.76, and after that goes to hell in a hurry. Under Karatsuba, doubling the input size "should take" 3 times longer instead of 4, and that remains the case throughout this range. I conclude that my "be nice to the cache" reworkings of k_mul() are paying.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d64c1def7c
commit
115c888b97
1 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -1539,20 +1539,21 @@ x_mul(PyLongObject *a, PyLongObject *b)
|
|||
twodigits carry = 0;
|
||||
twodigits f = a->ob_digit[i];
|
||||
int j;
|
||||
digit *pz = z->ob_digit + i;
|
||||
|
||||
SIGCHECK({
|
||||
Py_DECREF(z);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
})
|
||||
for (j = 0; j < size_b; ++j) {
|
||||
carry += z->ob_digit[i+j] + b->ob_digit[j] * f;
|
||||
z->ob_digit[i+j] = (digit) (carry & MASK);
|
||||
carry += *pz + b->ob_digit[j] * f;
|
||||
*pz++ = (digit) (carry & MASK);
|
||||
carry >>= SHIFT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (; carry != 0; ++j) {
|
||||
assert(i+j < z->ob_size);
|
||||
carry += z->ob_digit[i+j];
|
||||
z->ob_digit[i+j] = (digit) (carry & MASK);
|
||||
carry += *pz;
|
||||
*pz++ = (digit) (carry & MASK);
|
||||
carry >>= SHIFT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue