mirror of
https://github.com/python/cpython.git
synced 2025-08-04 08:59:19 +00:00
bpo-36946: Fix possible signed integer overflow when handling slices. (GH-13375)
The final addition (cur += step) may overflow, so use size_t for "cur". "cur" is always positive (even for negative steps), so it is safe to use size_t here. Co-Authored-By: Martin Panter <vadmium+py@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
870b035bc6
commit
14514d9084
15 changed files with 45 additions and 19 deletions
|
@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ class BaseTest:
|
|||
# Test extended slicing by comparing with list slicing
|
||||
# (Assumes list conversion works correctly, too)
|
||||
a = array.array(self.typecode, self.example)
|
||||
indices = (0, None, 1, 3, 19, 100, -1, -2, -31, -100)
|
||||
indices = (0, None, 1, 3, 19, 100, sys.maxsize, -1, -2, -31, -100)
|
||||
for start in indices:
|
||||
for stop in indices:
|
||||
# Everything except the initial 0 (invalid step)
|
||||
|
@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ class BaseTest:
|
|||
self.assertRaises(TypeError, a.__setitem__, slice(0, 1), b)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_extended_set_del_slice(self):
|
||||
indices = (0, None, 1, 3, 19, 100, -1, -2, -31, -100)
|
||||
indices = (0, None, 1, 3, 19, 100, sys.maxsize, -1, -2, -31, -100)
|
||||
for start in indices:
|
||||
for stop in indices:
|
||||
# Everything except the initial 0 (invalid step)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue