mirror of
https://github.com/python/cpython.git
synced 2025-07-29 06:05:00 +00:00
Some days, I think my comment of
/* this is harder to get right than you might think */ angered some God somewhere. After noticing >>> range(5000000)[slice(96360, None, 439)] [] I found that my cute test for the slice being empty failed due to overflow. Fixed, and added simple test (not the above!).
This commit is contained in:
parent
d7c14c6c9b
commit
173f11da5d
2 changed files with 15 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
|
|||
# tests for slice objects; in particular the indices method.
|
||||
|
||||
from test.test_support import vereq
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
|
||||
vereq(slice(None ).indices(10), (0, 10, 1))
|
||||
vereq(slice(None, None, 2).indices(10), (0, 10, 2))
|
||||
|
@ -11,3 +12,5 @@ vereq(slice(3, None, -2).indices(10), (3, -1, -2))
|
|||
vereq(slice(-100, 100 ).indices(10), slice(None).indices(10))
|
||||
vereq(slice(100, -100, -1).indices(10), slice(None, None, -1).indices(10))
|
||||
vereq(slice(-100L, 100L, 2L).indices(10), (0, 10, 2))
|
||||
|
||||
vereq(range(10)[::sys.maxint - 1], [0])
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue