mirror of
https://github.com/python/cpython.git
synced 2025-11-02 11:08:57 +00:00
Changes to some math using underscore as subscript, necessary since
the new style file defines underscore as an underscore in tt font.
This commit is contained in:
parent
16b22193e6
commit
4ac605e627
3 changed files with 6 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ tut:
|
|||
ref:
|
||||
touch ref.ind
|
||||
latex ref
|
||||
./fix_hack ref.idx
|
||||
makeindex ref
|
||||
latex ref
|
||||
dvips ref >ref.ps
|
||||
|
|
@ -38,7 +39,7 @@ libinfo:
|
|||
sh fix.sh
|
||||
|
||||
clean:
|
||||
rm -f @* *~ *.aux *.idx *.ilg *.ind *.log *.toc *.blg *.bbl
|
||||
rm -f @* *~ *.aux *.idx *.ilg *.ind *.log *.toc *.blg *.bbl *.pyc
|
||||
# Sources: .tex, .bib, .sty
|
||||
# Useful results: .dvi, .ps
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -523,12 +523,14 @@ evaluated only once (but in both cases $z$ is not evaluated at all
|
|||
when $x < y$ is found to be false).
|
||||
\indexii{chaining}{comparisons}
|
||||
|
||||
\catcode`\_=8
|
||||
Formally, $e_0 op_1 e_1 op_2 e_2 ...e_{n-1} op_n e_n$ is equivalent to
|
||||
$e_0 op_1 e_1$ \verb\and\ $e_1 op_2 e_2$ \verb\and\ ... \verb\and\
|
||||
$e_{n-1} op_n e_n$, except that each expression is evaluated at most once.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that $e_0 op_1 e_1 op_2 e_2$ does not imply any kind of comparison
|
||||
between $e_0$ and $e_2$, e.g. $x < y > z$ is perfectly legal.
|
||||
\catcode`\_=12
|
||||
|
||||
The forms \verb\<>\ and \verb\!=\ are equivalent; for consistency with
|
||||
C, \verb\!=\ is preferred; where \verb\!=\ is mentioned below
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -523,12 +523,14 @@ evaluated only once (but in both cases $z$ is not evaluated at all
|
|||
when $x < y$ is found to be false).
|
||||
\indexii{chaining}{comparisons}
|
||||
|
||||
\catcode`\_=8
|
||||
Formally, $e_0 op_1 e_1 op_2 e_2 ...e_{n-1} op_n e_n$ is equivalent to
|
||||
$e_0 op_1 e_1$ \verb\and\ $e_1 op_2 e_2$ \verb\and\ ... \verb\and\
|
||||
$e_{n-1} op_n e_n$, except that each expression is evaluated at most once.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that $e_0 op_1 e_1 op_2 e_2$ does not imply any kind of comparison
|
||||
between $e_0$ and $e_2$, e.g. $x < y > z$ is perfectly legal.
|
||||
\catcode`\_=12
|
||||
|
||||
The forms \verb\<>\ and \verb\!=\ are equivalent; for consistency with
|
||||
C, \verb\!=\ is preferred; where \verb\!=\ is mentioned below
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue