[3.12] gh-110383: Clarify "non-integral" wording in pow() docs (GH-119688) (#120207)

(cherry picked from commit 6646a9da26)

Co-authored-by: Aditya Borikar <adityaborikar2@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Miss Islington (bot) 2024-06-07 11:53:55 +02:00 committed by GitHub
parent 315611aac8
commit 501cd99c8e
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194

View file

@ -1496,7 +1496,9 @@ are always available. They are listed here in alphabetical order.
returns ``100``, but ``pow(10, -2)`` returns ``0.01``. For a negative base of
type :class:`int` or :class:`float` and a non-integral exponent, a complex
result is delivered. For example, ``pow(-9, 0.5)`` returns a value close
to ``3j``.
to ``3j``. Whereas, for a negative base of type :class:`int` or :class:`float`
with an integral exponent, a float result is delivered. For example,
``pow(-9, 2.0)`` returns ``81.0``.
For :class:`int` operands *base* and *exp*, if *mod* is present, *mod* must
also be of integer type and *mod* must be nonzero. If *mod* is present and