[3.13] Docs: Fix typo in socketserver documentation (GH-140956) (#141798)
Some checks are pending
Tests / Windows MSI (push) Blocked by required conditions
Tests / (push) Blocked by required conditions
Tests / Android (aarch64) (push) Blocked by required conditions
Tests / Android (x86_64) (push) Blocked by required conditions
Tests / Check if the ABI has changed (push) Blocked by required conditions
Tests / Change detection (push) Waiting to run
Tests / Docs (push) Blocked by required conditions
Tests / Check if Autoconf files are up to date (push) Blocked by required conditions
Tests / Check if generated files are up to date (push) Blocked by required conditions
Tests / WASI (push) Blocked by required conditions
Tests / Ubuntu SSL tests with OpenSSL (push) Blocked by required conditions
Tests / Hypothesis tests on Ubuntu (push) Blocked by required conditions
Tests / Address sanitizer (push) Blocked by required conditions
Tests / Sanitizers (push) Blocked by required conditions
Tests / CIFuzz (push) Blocked by required conditions
Tests / All required checks pass (push) Blocked by required conditions
Lint / lint (push) Waiting to run

Co-authored-by: Thomas Ballard <thomasballard0503@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Miss Islington (bot) 2025-11-20 17:35:54 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent ad9f2ed8ca
commit 5285ccc19e
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194

View file

@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ The difference is that the ``readline()`` call in the second handler will call
first handler had to use a ``recv()`` loop to accumulate data until a
newline itself. If it had just used a single ``recv()`` without the loop it
would just have returned what has been received so far from the client.
TCP is stream based: data arrives in the order it was sent, but there no
TCP is stream based: data arrives in the order it was sent, but there is no
correlation between client ``send()`` or ``sendall()`` calls and the number
of ``recv()`` calls on the server required to receive it.