bpo-40609: _Py_hashtable_t values become void* (GH-20065)

_Py_hashtable_t values become regular "void *" pointers.

* Add _Py_hashtable_entry_t.data member
* Remove _Py_hashtable_t.data_size member
* Remove _Py_hashtable_t.get_func member. It is no longer needed
  to specialize _Py_hashtable_get() for a specific value size, since
  all entries now have the same size (void*).
* Remove the following macros:

  * _Py_HASHTABLE_GET()
  * _Py_HASHTABLE_SET()
  * _Py_HASHTABLE_SET_NODATA()
  * _Py_HASHTABLE_POP()

* Rename _Py_hashtable_pop() to _Py_hashtable_steal()
* _Py_hashtable_foreach() callback now gets key and value rather than
  entry.
* Remove _Py_hashtable_value_destroy_func type. value_destroy_func
  callback now only has a single parameter: data (void*).
This commit is contained in:
Victor Stinner 2020-05-13 04:40:30 +02:00 committed by GitHub
parent d95bd4214c
commit 5b0a30354d
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
4 changed files with 142 additions and 305 deletions

View file

@ -302,10 +302,10 @@ w_ref(PyObject *v, char *flag, WFILE *p)
if (Py_REFCNT(v) == 1)
return 0;
entry = _Py_HASHTABLE_GET_ENTRY(p->hashtable, v);
entry = _Py_hashtable_get_entry(p->hashtable, v);
if (entry != NULL) {
/* write the reference index to the stream */
_Py_HASHTABLE_ENTRY_READ_DATA(p->hashtable, entry, w);
w = (int)(uintptr_t)entry->value;
/* we don't store "long" indices in the dict */
assert(0 <= w && w <= 0x7fffffff);
w_byte(TYPE_REF, p);
@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ w_ref(PyObject *v, char *flag, WFILE *p)
}
w = (int)s;
Py_INCREF(v);
if (_Py_HASHTABLE_SET(p->hashtable, v, w) < 0) {
if (_Py_hashtable_set(p->hashtable, v, (void *)(uintptr_t)w) < 0) {
Py_DECREF(v);
goto err;
}
@ -556,8 +556,7 @@ static int
w_init_refs(WFILE *wf, int version)
{
if (version >= 3) {
wf->hashtable = _Py_hashtable_new_full(sizeof(int), 0,
_Py_hashtable_hash_ptr,
wf->hashtable = _Py_hashtable_new_full(_Py_hashtable_hash_ptr,
_Py_hashtable_compare_direct,
w_decref_entry, NULL, NULL);
if (wf->hashtable == NULL) {