Fix a bunch of doctests with the -d option of refactor.py.

We still have 27 failing tests (down from 39).
This commit is contained in:
Guido van Rossum 2007-02-09 20:13:25 +00:00
parent 4502c804b9
commit 7131f84400
24 changed files with 217 additions and 217 deletions

View file

@ -80,9 +80,9 @@ attributes by using the .output() function
>>> C = Cookie.SmartCookie()
>>> C["rocky"] = "road"
>>> C["rocky"]["path"] = "/cookie"
>>> print(C.output(header="Cookie:"))
>>> print((C.output(header="Cookie:")))
Cookie: rocky=road; Path=/cookie
>>> print(C.output(attrs=[], header="Cookie:"))
>>> print((C.output(attrs=[], header="Cookie:")))
Cookie: rocky=road
The load() method of a Cookie extracts cookies from a string. In a
@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ such trickeries do not confuse it.
>>> C = Cookie.SmartCookie()
>>> C.load('keebler="E=everybody; L=\\"Loves\\"; fudge=\\012;";')
>>> print(C)
>>> print((C))
Set-Cookie: keebler="E=everybody; L=\"Loves\"; fudge=\012;"
Each element of the Cookie also supports all of the RFC 2109
@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ attribute.
>>> C = Cookie.SmartCookie()
>>> C["oreo"] = "doublestuff"
>>> C["oreo"]["path"] = "/"
>>> print(C)
>>> print((C))
Set-Cookie: oreo=doublestuff; Path=/
Each dictionary element has a 'value' attribute, which gives you
@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ it is still possible to use Cookie.Cookie() to create a Cookie. In
fact, this simply returns a SmartCookie.
>>> C = Cookie.Cookie()
>>> print(C.__class__.__name__)
>>> print((C.__class__.__name__))
SmartCookie