Issue 2440: revert r62269 and r62279. These changes were made in an effort to fix test_args2.Signed_TestCase.test_n(), which was failing on Windows x64 on the following line: 'self.failUnlessEqual(99, getargs_n(Long()))'. Although the two commits *did* fix the test on Windows x64, it's become clear that it's the test that's incorrect, and the changes to PyNumber_Index() in particular were not warranted (and actually violate PEP 357). This commit will get us back to where we were at r62268, before I started butchering things.

This commit is contained in:
Trent Nelson 2008-04-11 23:02:37 +00:00
parent dd21912cd0
commit 7179220b57
3 changed files with 6 additions and 21 deletions

View file

@ -1220,7 +1220,6 @@ PyNumber_Absolute(PyObject *o)
PyObject *
PyNumber_Index(PyObject *item)
{
PyNumberMethods *m;
PyObject *result = NULL;
if (item == NULL)
return null_error();
@ -1228,9 +1227,8 @@ PyNumber_Index(PyObject *item)
Py_INCREF(item);
return item;
}
m = item->ob_type->tp_as_number;
if (PyIndex_Check(item)) {
result = m->nb_index(item);
result = item->ob_type->tp_as_number->nb_index(item);
if (result && !PyLong_Check(result)) {
PyErr_Format(PyExc_TypeError,
"__index__ returned non-int "
@ -1240,17 +1238,7 @@ PyNumber_Index(PyObject *item)
return NULL;
}
}
else if (m && m->nb_int != NULL && m->nb_float == NULL) {
result = m->nb_int(item);
if (result && !PyLong_Check(result)) {
PyErr_Format(PyExc_TypeError,
"__int__ returned non-int "
"(type %.200s)",
result->ob_type->tp_name);
Py_DECREF(result);
return NULL;
}
} else {
else {
PyErr_Format(PyExc_TypeError,
"'%.200s' object cannot be interpreted "
"as an integer", item->ob_type->tp_name);