mirrors/cpython
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/python/cpython.git synced 2025-07-24 11:44:31 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 8

Issue #18702: All skipped tests now reported as skipped.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Serhiy Storchaka 2013-11-03 21:31:18 +02:00
parent 834856aca9
commit 7908068627
21 changed files with 908 additions and 883 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

59
Lib/test/test_math.py
View file

@ -980,38 +980,37 @@ class MathTests(unittest.TestCase):
# still fails this part of the test on some platforms. For now, we only
# *run* test_exceptions() in verbose mode, so that this isn't normally
# tested.
@unittest.skipUnless(verbose, 'requires verbose mode')
def test_exceptions(self):
try:
x = math.exp(-1000000000)
except:
# mathmodule.c is failing to weed out underflows from libm, or
# we've got an fp format with huge dynamic range
self.fail("underflowing exp() should not have raised "
"an exception")
if x != 0:
self.fail("underflowing exp() should have returned 0")
if verbose:
def test_exceptions(self):
try:
x = math.exp(-1000000000)
except:
# mathmodule.c is failing to weed out underflows from libm, or
# we've got an fp format with huge dynamic range
self.fail("underflowing exp() should not have raised "
"an exception")
if x != 0:
self.fail("underflowing exp() should have returned 0")
# If this fails, probably using a strict IEEE-754 conforming libm, and x
# is +Inf afterwards. But Python wants overflows detected by default.
try:
x = math.exp(1000000000)
except OverflowError:
pass
else:
self.fail("overflowing exp() didn't trigger OverflowError")
# If this fails, probably using a strict IEEE-754 conforming libm, and x
# is +Inf afterwards. But Python wants overflows detected by default.
try:
x = math.exp(1000000000)
except OverflowError:
pass
else:
self.fail("overflowing exp() didn't trigger OverflowError")
# If this fails, it could be a puzzle. One odd possibility is that
# mathmodule.c's macros are getting confused while comparing
# Inf (HUGE_VAL) to a NaN, and artificially setting errno to ERANGE
# as a result (and so raising OverflowError instead).
try:
x = math.sqrt(-1.0)
except ValueError:
pass
else:
self.fail("sqrt(-1) didn't raise ValueError")
# If this fails, it could be a puzzle. One odd possibility is that
# mathmodule.c's macros are getting confused while comparing
# Inf (HUGE_VAL) to a NaN, and artificially setting errno to ERANGE
# as a result (and so raising OverflowError instead).
try:
x = math.sqrt(-1.0)
except ValueError:
pass
else:
self.fail("sqrt(-1) didn't raise ValueError")
@requires_IEEE_754
def test_testfile(self):