mirror of
https://github.com/python/cpython.git
synced 2025-07-30 06:34:15 +00:00
Forward-port of r52136,52138: a review of overflow-detecting code.
* unified the way intobject, longobject and mystrtoul handle values around -sys.maxint-1. * in general, trying to entierely avoid overflows in any computation involving signed ints or longs is extremely involved. Fixed a few simple cases where a compiler might be too clever (but that's all guesswork). * more overflow checks against bad data in marshal.c. * 2.5 specific: fixed a number of places that were still confusing int and Py_ssize_t. Some of them could potentially have caused "real-world" breakage. * list.pop(x): fixing overflow issues on x was messy. I just reverted to PyArg_ParseTuple("n"), which does the right thing. (An obscure test was trying to give a Decimal to list.pop()... doesn't make sense any more IMHO) * trying to write a few tests...
This commit is contained in:
parent
0d2f498a4c
commit
7ccbca93a2
19 changed files with 186 additions and 106 deletions
|
@ -546,6 +546,17 @@ int_mul(PyObject *v, PyObject *w)
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Integer overflow checking for unary negation: on a 2's-complement
|
||||
* box, -x overflows iff x is the most negative long. In this case we
|
||||
* get -x == x. However, -x is undefined (by C) if x /is/ the most
|
||||
* negative long (it's a signed overflow case), and some compilers care.
|
||||
* So we cast x to unsigned long first. However, then other compilers
|
||||
* warn about applying unary minus to an unsigned operand. Hence the
|
||||
* weird "0-".
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define UNARY_NEG_WOULD_OVERFLOW(x) \
|
||||
((x) < 0 && (unsigned long)(x) == 0-(unsigned long)(x))
|
||||
|
||||
/* Return type of i_divmod */
|
||||
enum divmod_result {
|
||||
DIVMOD_OK, /* Correct result */
|
||||
|
@ -565,7 +576,7 @@ i_divmod(register long x, register long y,
|
|||
return DIVMOD_ERROR;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* (-sys.maxint-1)/-1 is the only overflow case. */
|
||||
if (y == -1 && x == LONG_MIN)
|
||||
if (y == -1 && UNARY_NEG_WOULD_OVERFLOW(x))
|
||||
return DIVMOD_OVERFLOW;
|
||||
xdivy = x / y;
|
||||
xmody = x - xdivy * y;
|
||||
|
@ -756,7 +767,8 @@ int_neg(PyIntObject *v)
|
|||
{
|
||||
register long a;
|
||||
a = v->ob_ival;
|
||||
if (a < 0 && (unsigned long)a == 0-(unsigned long)a) {
|
||||
/* check for overflow */
|
||||
if (UNARY_NEG_WOULD_OVERFLOW(a)) {
|
||||
PyObject *o = PyLong_FromLong(a);
|
||||
if (o != NULL) {
|
||||
PyObject *result = PyNumber_Negative(o);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue