bpo-32417: Make timedelta arithmetic respect subclasses (#10902)

* Make timedelta return subclass types

Previously timedelta would always return the `date` and `datetime`
types, regardless of what it is added to. This makes it return
an object of the type it was added to.

* Add tests for timedelta arithmetic on subclasses

* Make pure python timedelta return subclass types

* Add test for fromtimestamp with tz argument

* Add tests for subclass behavior in now

* Add news entry.

Fixes:
bpo-32417
bpo-35364

* More descriptive variable names in tests

Addresses Victor's comments
This commit is contained in:
Paul Ganssle 2019-02-04 14:42:04 -05:00 committed by Alexander Belopolsky
parent ca7d2933a3
commit 89427cd0fe
4 changed files with 90 additions and 19 deletions

View file

@ -820,6 +820,44 @@ class TestTimeDelta(HarmlessMixedComparison, unittest.TestCase):
self.assertEqual(str(t3), str(t4))
self.assertEqual(t4.as_hours(), -1)
def test_subclass_date(self):
class DateSubclass(date):
pass
d1 = DateSubclass(2018, 1, 5)
td = timedelta(days=1)
tests = [
('add', lambda d, t: d + t, DateSubclass(2018, 1, 6)),
('radd', lambda d, t: t + d, DateSubclass(2018, 1, 6)),
('sub', lambda d, t: d - t, DateSubclass(2018, 1, 4)),
]
for name, func, expected in tests:
with self.subTest(name):
act = func(d1, td)
self.assertEqual(act, expected)
self.assertIsInstance(act, DateSubclass)
def test_subclass_datetime(self):
class DateTimeSubclass(datetime):
pass
d1 = DateTimeSubclass(2018, 1, 5, 12, 30)
td = timedelta(days=1, minutes=30)
tests = [
('add', lambda d, t: d + t, DateTimeSubclass(2018, 1, 6, 13)),
('radd', lambda d, t: t + d, DateTimeSubclass(2018, 1, 6, 13)),
('sub', lambda d, t: d - t, DateTimeSubclass(2018, 1, 4, 12)),
]
for name, func, expected in tests:
with self.subTest(name):
act = func(d1, td)
self.assertEqual(act, expected)
self.assertIsInstance(act, DateTimeSubclass)
def test_division(self):
t = timedelta(hours=1, minutes=24, seconds=19)
second = timedelta(seconds=1)
@ -2604,33 +2642,58 @@ class TestDateTime(TestDate):
ts = base_d.timestamp()
test_cases = [
('fromtimestamp', (ts,)),
('fromtimestamp', (ts,), base_d),
# See https://bugs.python.org/issue32417
# ('fromtimestamp', (ts, timezone.utc)),
('utcfromtimestamp', (utc_ts,)),
('fromisoformat', (d_isoformat,)),
('strptime', (d_isoformat, '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%f')),
('combine', (date(*args[0:3]), time(*args[3:]))),
('fromtimestamp', (ts, timezone.utc),
base_d.astimezone(timezone.utc)),
('utcfromtimestamp', (utc_ts,), base_d),
('fromisoformat', (d_isoformat,), base_d),
('strptime', (d_isoformat, '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%f'), base_d),
('combine', (date(*args[0:3]), time(*args[3:])), base_d),
]
for constr_name, constr_args in test_cases:
for constr_name, constr_args, expected in test_cases:
for base_obj in (DateTimeSubclass, base_d):
# Test both the classmethod and method
with self.subTest(base_obj_type=type(base_obj),
constr_name=constr_name):
constr = getattr(base_obj, constr_name)
constructor = getattr(base_obj, constr_name)
dt = constr(*constr_args)
dt = constructor(*constr_args)
# Test that it creates the right subclass
self.assertIsInstance(dt, DateTimeSubclass)
# Test that it's equal to the base object
self.assertEqual(dt, base_d.replace(tzinfo=None))
self.assertEqual(dt, expected)
# Test that it called the constructor
self.assertEqual(dt.extra, 7)
def test_subclass_now(self):
# Test that alternate constructors call the constructor
class DateTimeSubclass(self.theclass):
def __new__(cls, *args, **kwargs):
result = self.theclass.__new__(cls, *args, **kwargs)
result.extra = 7
return result
test_cases = [
('now', 'now', {}),
('utcnow', 'utcnow', {}),
('now_utc', 'now', {'tz': timezone.utc}),
('now_fixed', 'now', {'tz': timezone(timedelta(hours=-5), "EST")}),
]
for name, meth_name, kwargs in test_cases:
with self.subTest(name):
constr = getattr(DateTimeSubclass, meth_name)
dt = constr(**kwargs)
self.assertIsInstance(dt, DateTimeSubclass)
self.assertEqual(dt.extra, 7)
def test_fromisoformat_datetime(self):
# Test that isoformat() is reversible
base_dates = [