Backed out changeset af29d89083b3 (closes #25548) (closes #27498)

Lib/test/test_descrtut.py

@@ -37,16 +37,16 @@ test_1 = """
 Here's the new type at work:
 
     >>> print(defaultdict)              # show our type
-    <class 'test.test_descrtut.defaultdict' ...>
+    <class 'test.test_descrtut.defaultdict'>
     >>> print(type(defaultdict))        # its metatype
-    <class 'type' ...>
+    <class 'type'>
     >>> a = defaultdict(default=0.0)    # create an instance
     >>> print(a)                        # show the instance
     {}
     >>> print(type(a))                  # show its type
-    <class 'test.test_descrtut.defaultdict' ...>
+    <class 'test.test_descrtut.defaultdict'>
     >>> print(a.__class__)              # show its class
-    <class 'test.test_descrtut.defaultdict' ...>
+    <class 'test.test_descrtut.defaultdict'>
     >>> print(type(a) is a.__class__)   # its type is its class
     True
     >>> a[1] = 3.25                     # modify the instance
@@ -149,11 +149,11 @@ Introspecting instances of built-in types
 For instance of built-in types, x.__class__ is now the same as type(x):
 
     >>> type([])
-    <class 'list' ...>
+    <class 'list'>
     >>> [].__class__
-    <class 'list' ...>
+    <class 'list'>
     >>> list
-    <class 'list' ...>
+    <class 'list'>
     >>> isinstance([], list)
     True
     >>> isinstance([], dict)
@@ -258,19 +258,19 @@ implicit first argument that is the *class* for which they are invoked.
     ...         print("classmethod", cls, y)
 
     >>> C.foo(1)
-    classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.C' ...> 1
+    classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.C'> 1
     >>> c = C()
     >>> c.foo(1)
-    classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.C' ...> 1
+    classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.C'> 1
 
     >>> class D(C):
     ...     pass
 
     >>> D.foo(1)
-    classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.D' ...> 1
+    classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.D'> 1
     >>> d = D()
     >>> d.foo(1)
-    classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.D' ...> 1
+    classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.D'> 1
 
 This prints "classmethod __main__.D 1" both times; in other words, the
 class passed as the first argument of foo() is the class involved in the
@@ -286,11 +286,11 @@ But notice this:
 
     >>> E.foo(1)
     E.foo() called
-    classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.C' ...> 1
+    classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.C'> 1
     >>> e = E()
     >>> e.foo(1)
     E.foo() called
-    classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.C' ...> 1
+    classmethod <class 'test.test_descrtut.C'> 1
 
 In this example, the call to C.foo() from E.foo() will see class C as its
 first argument, not class E. This is to be expected, since the call
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ Hmm -- property is builtin now, so let's try it that way too.
 
     >>> del property  # unmask the builtin
     >>> property
-    <class 'property' ...>
+    <class 'property'>
 
     >>> class C(object):
     ...     def __init__(self):
@@ -478,8 +478,7 @@ def test_main(verbose=None):
     # business is used the name can change depending on how the test is
     # invoked.
     from test import support, test_descrtut
-    import doctest
-    support.run_doctest(test_descrtut, verbose, optionflags=doctest.ELLIPSIS)
+    support.run_doctest(test_descrtut, verbose)
 
 # This part isn't needed for regrtest, but for running the test directly.
 if __name__ == "__main__":