mirror of
https://github.com/python/cpython.git
synced 2025-11-03 11:23:31 +00:00
Streamline FAQ entry about the ternary operator, and suggest using io.StringIO for a mutable unicode container.
This commit is contained in:
parent
9cb41dfbaa
commit
c5b266efb5
1 changed files with 20 additions and 54 deletions
|
|
@ -679,61 +679,21 @@ are not truly operators but syntactic delimiters in assignment statements.
|
||||||
Is there an equivalent of C's "?:" ternary operator?
|
Is there an equivalent of C's "?:" ternary operator?
|
||||||
----------------------------------------------------
|
----------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Yes, this feature was added in Python 2.5. The syntax would be as follows::
|
Yes, there is. The syntax is as follows::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[on_true] if [expression] else [on_false]
|
[on_true] if [expression] else [on_false]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
x, y = 50, 25
|
x, y = 50, 25
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
small = x if x < y else y
|
small = x if x < y else y
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For versions previous to 2.5 the answer would be 'No'.
|
Before this syntax was introduced in Python 2.5, a common idiom was to use
|
||||||
|
logical operators::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
.. XXX remove rest?
|
[expression] and [on_true] or [on_false]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In many cases you can mimic ``a ? b : c`` with ``a and b or c``, but there's a
|
However, this idiom is unsafe, as it can give wrong results when *on_true*
|
||||||
flaw: if *b* is zero (or empty, or ``None`` -- anything that tests false) then
|
has a false boolean value. Therefore, it is always better to use
|
||||||
*c* will be selected instead. In many cases you can prove by looking at the
|
the ``... if ... else ...`` form.
|
||||||
code that this can't happen (e.g. because *b* is a constant or has a type that
|
|
||||||
can never be false), but in general this can be a problem.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Tim Peters (who wishes it was Steve Majewski) suggested the following solution:
|
|
||||||
``(a and [b] or [c])[0]``. Because ``[b]`` is a singleton list it is never
|
|
||||||
false, so the wrong path is never taken; then applying ``[0]`` to the whole
|
|
||||||
thing gets the *b* or *c* that you really wanted. Ugly, but it gets you there
|
|
||||||
in the rare cases where it is really inconvenient to rewrite your code using
|
|
||||||
'if'.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The best course is usually to write a simple ``if...else`` statement. Another
|
|
||||||
solution is to implement the ``?:`` operator as a function::
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def q(cond, on_true, on_false):
|
|
||||||
if cond:
|
|
||||||
if not isfunction(on_true):
|
|
||||||
return on_true
|
|
||||||
else:
|
|
||||||
return on_true()
|
|
||||||
else:
|
|
||||||
if not isfunction(on_false):
|
|
||||||
return on_false
|
|
||||||
else:
|
|
||||||
return on_false()
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In most cases you'll pass b and c directly: ``q(a, b, c)``. To avoid evaluating
|
|
||||||
b or c when they shouldn't be, encapsulate them within a lambda function, e.g.:
|
|
||||||
``q(a, lambda: b, lambda: c)``.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
It has been asked *why* Python has no if-then-else expression. There are
|
|
||||||
several answers: many languages do just fine without one; it can easily lead to
|
|
||||||
less readable code; no sufficiently "Pythonic" syntax has been discovered; a
|
|
||||||
search of the standard library found remarkably few places where using an
|
|
||||||
if-then-else expression would make the code more understandable.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In 2002, :pep:`308` was written proposing several possible syntaxes and the
|
|
||||||
community was asked to vote on the issue. The vote was inconclusive. Most
|
|
||||||
people liked one of the syntaxes, but also hated other syntaxes; many votes
|
|
||||||
implied that people preferred no ternary operator rather than having a syntax
|
|
||||||
they hated.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Is it possible to write obfuscated one-liners in Python?
|
Is it possible to write obfuscated one-liners in Python?
|
||||||
|
|
@ -852,15 +812,21 @@ the :ref:`string-formatting` section, e.g. ``"{:04d}".format(144)`` yields
|
||||||
How do I modify a string in place?
|
How do I modify a string in place?
|
||||||
----------------------------------
|
----------------------------------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
You can't, because strings are immutable. If you need an object with this
|
You can't, because strings are immutable. In most situations, you should
|
||||||
ability, try converting the string to a list or use the array module::
|
simply construct a new string from the various parts you want to assemble
|
||||||
|
it from. However, if you need an object with the ability to modify in-place
|
||||||
|
unicode data, try using a :class:`io.StringIO` object or the :mod:`array`
|
||||||
|
module::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
>>> s = "Hello, world"
|
>>> s = "Hello, world"
|
||||||
>>> a = list(s)
|
>>> sio = io.StringIO(s)
|
||||||
>>> print(a)
|
>>> sio.getvalue()
|
||||||
['H', 'e', 'l', 'l', 'o', ',', ' ', 'w', 'o', 'r', 'l', 'd']
|
'Hello, world'
|
||||||
>>> a[7:] = list("there!")
|
>>> sio.seek(7)
|
||||||
>>> ''.join(a)
|
7
|
||||||
|
>>> sio.write("there!")
|
||||||
|
6
|
||||||
|
>>> sio.getvalue()
|
||||||
'Hello, there!'
|
'Hello, there!'
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
>>> import array
|
>>> import array
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue