Issue #15144: Fix possible integer overflow when handling pointers as integer values, by using Py_uintptr_t instead of size_t.

Patch by Serhiy Storchaka.
This commit is contained in:
Antoine Pitrou 2012-09-20 20:56:47 +02:00
parent 1c47222a25
commit ca8aa4acf6
11 changed files with 44 additions and 45 deletions

View file

@ -181,12 +181,9 @@ PyAPI_FUNC(PyVarObject *) _PyObject_NewVar(PyTypeObject *, Py_ssize_t);
#endif
#define _PyObject_VAR_SIZE(typeobj, nitems) \
(size_t) \
( ( (typeobj)->tp_basicsize + \
(nitems)*(typeobj)->tp_itemsize + \
(SIZEOF_VOID_P - 1) \
) & ~(SIZEOF_VOID_P - 1) \
)
_Py_SIZE_ROUND_UP((typeobj)->tp_basicsize + \
(nitems)*(typeobj)->tp_itemsize, \
SIZEOF_VOID_P)
#define PyObject_NEW(type, typeobj) \
( (type *) PyObject_Init( \

View file

@ -52,4 +52,18 @@
#define PyDoc_STR(str) ""
#endif
/* Below "a" is a power of 2. */
/* Round down size "n" to be a multiple of "a". */
#define _Py_SIZE_ROUND_DOWN(n, a) ((size_t)(n) & ~(size_t)((a) - 1))
/* Round up size "n" to be a multiple of "a". */
#define _Py_SIZE_ROUND_UP(n, a) (((size_t)(n) + \
(size_t)((a) - 1)) & ~(size_t)((a) - 1))
/* Round pointer "p" down to the closest "a"-aligned address <= "p". */
#define _Py_ALIGN_DOWN(p, a) ((void *)((Py_uintptr_t)(p) & ~(Py_uintptr_t)((a) - 1)))
/* Round pointer "p" up to the closest "a"-aligned address >= "p". */
#define _Py_ALIGN_UP(p, a) ((void *)(((Py_uintptr_t)(p) + \
(Py_uintptr_t)((a) - 1)) & ~(Py_uintptr_t)((a) - 1)))
/* Check if pointer "p" is aligned to "a"-bytes boundary. */
#define _Py_IS_ALIGNED(p, a) (!((Py_uintptr_t)(p) & (Py_uintptr_t)((a) - 1)))
#endif /* Py_PYMACRO_H */