Issue #15144: Fix possible integer overflow when handling pointers as integer values, by using Py_uintptr_t instead of size_t.

Patch by Serhiy Storchaka.
This commit is contained in:
Antoine Pitrou 2012-09-20 20:56:47 +02:00
parent 1c47222a25
commit ca8aa4acf6
11 changed files with 44 additions and 45 deletions

View file

@ -2,9 +2,6 @@
#if STRINGLIB_IS_UNICODE
/* Mask to check or force alignment of a pointer to C 'long' boundaries */
#define LONG_PTR_MASK (size_t) (SIZEOF_LONG - 1)
/* Mask to quickly check whether a C 'long' contains a
non-ASCII, UTF8-encoded char. */
#if (SIZEOF_LONG == 8)
@ -21,10 +18,11 @@ Py_LOCAL_INLINE(Py_UCS4)
STRINGLIB(find_max_char)(const STRINGLIB_CHAR *begin, const STRINGLIB_CHAR *end)
{
const unsigned char *p = (const unsigned char *) begin;
const unsigned char *aligned_end = (const unsigned char *) ((size_t) end & ~LONG_PTR_MASK);
const unsigned char *aligned_end =
(const unsigned char *) _Py_ALIGN_DOWN(end, SIZEOF_LONG);
while (p < end) {
if (!((size_t) p & LONG_PTR_MASK)) {
if (_Py_IS_ALIGNED(p, SIZEOF_LONG)) {
/* Help register allocation */
register const unsigned char *_p = p;
while (_p < aligned_end) {
@ -43,7 +41,6 @@ STRINGLIB(find_max_char)(const STRINGLIB_CHAR *begin, const STRINGLIB_CHAR *end)
return 127;
}
#undef LONG_PTR_MASK
#undef ASCII_CHAR_MASK
#else /* STRINGLIB_SIZEOF_CHAR == 1 */
@ -72,7 +69,7 @@ STRINGLIB(find_max_char)(const STRINGLIB_CHAR *begin, const STRINGLIB_CHAR *end)
register Py_UCS4 mask;
Py_ssize_t n = end - begin;
const STRINGLIB_CHAR *p = begin;
const STRINGLIB_CHAR *unrolled_end = begin + (n & ~ (Py_ssize_t) 3);
const STRINGLIB_CHAR *unrolled_end = begin + _Py_SIZE_ROUND_DOWN(n, 4);
Py_UCS4 max_char;
max_char = MAX_CHAR_ASCII;