Issue #15144: Fix possible integer overflow when handling pointers as integer values, by using Py_uintptr_t instead of size_t.

Patch by Serhiy Storchaka.
This commit is contained in:
Antoine Pitrou 2012-09-20 20:56:47 +02:00
parent 1c47222a25
commit ca8aa4acf6
11 changed files with 44 additions and 45 deletions

View file

@ -12,8 +12,6 @@
#define DEFAULT_BLOCK_SIZE 8192
#define ALIGNMENT 8
#define ALIGNMENT_MASK (ALIGNMENT - 1)
#define ROUNDUP(x) (((x) + ALIGNMENT_MASK) & ~ALIGNMENT_MASK)
typedef struct _block {
/* Total number of bytes owned by this block available to pass out.
@ -85,8 +83,8 @@ block_new(size_t size)
b->ab_size = size;
b->ab_mem = (void *)(b + 1);
b->ab_next = NULL;
b->ab_offset = ROUNDUP((Py_uintptr_t)(b->ab_mem)) -
(Py_uintptr_t)(b->ab_mem);
b->ab_offset = (char *)_Py_ALIGN_UP(b->ab_mem, ALIGNMENT) -
(char *)(b->ab_mem);
return b;
}
@ -104,7 +102,7 @@ block_alloc(block *b, size_t size)
{
void *p;
assert(b);
size = ROUNDUP(size);
size = _Py_SIZE_ROUND_UP(size, ALIGNMENT);
if (b->ab_offset + size > b->ab_size) {
/* If we need to allocate more memory than will fit in
the default block, allocate a one-off block that is