mirror of
https://github.com/python/cpython.git
synced 2025-09-28 19:25:27 +00:00
bpo-42392: Mention loop removal in whatsnew for 3.10 (GH-24256)
@vstinner [noticed on python-dev](https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/thread/O3T7SK3BGMFWMLCQXDODZJSBL42AUWTR/) that there is no what's new or porting entry for removal of asyncio ``loop`` parameter. This patch adds a basic guide. Co-Authored-By: Kyle Stanley <aeros167@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a698d52c39
commit
dcea78ff53
1 changed files with 37 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -558,6 +558,23 @@ Removed
|
|||
the :mod:`collections` module.
|
||||
(Contributed by Victor Stinner in :issue:`37324`.)
|
||||
|
||||
* The ``loop`` parameter has been removed from most of :mod:`asyncio`\ 's
|
||||
:doc:`high-level API <../library/asyncio-api-index>` following deprecation
|
||||
in Python 3.8. The motivation behind this change is multifold:
|
||||
|
||||
1. This simplifies the high-level API.
|
||||
2. The functions in the high-level API have been implicitly getting the
|
||||
current thread's running event loop since Python 3.7. There isn't a need to
|
||||
pass the event loop to the API in most normal use cases.
|
||||
3. Event loop passing is error-prone especially when dealing with loops
|
||||
running in different threads.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the low-level API will still accept ``loop``.
|
||||
See `Changes in the Python API`_ for examples of how to replace existing code.
|
||||
|
||||
(Contributed by Yurii Karabas, Andrew Svetlov, Yury Selivanov and Kyle Stanley
|
||||
in :issue:`42392`.)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Porting to Python 3.10
|
||||
======================
|
||||
|
@ -596,6 +613,26 @@ Changes in the Python API
|
|||
a 16-bit unsigned integer.
|
||||
(Contributed by Erlend E. Aasland in :issue:`42393`.)
|
||||
|
||||
* The ``loop`` parameter has been removed from most of :mod:`asyncio`\ 's
|
||||
:doc:`high-level API <../library/asyncio-api-index>` following deprecation
|
||||
in Python 3.8.
|
||||
|
||||
A coroutine that currently look like this::
|
||||
|
||||
async def foo(loop):
|
||||
await asyncio.sleep(1, loop=loop)
|
||||
|
||||
Should be replaced with this::
|
||||
|
||||
async def foo():
|
||||
await asyncio.sleep(1)
|
||||
|
||||
If ``foo()`` was specifically designed *not* to run in the current thread's
|
||||
running event loop (e.g. running in another thread's event loop), consider
|
||||
using :func:`asyncio.run_coroutine_threadsafe` instead.
|
||||
|
||||
(Contributed by Yurii Karabas, Andrew Svetlov, Yury Selivanov and Kyle Stanley
|
||||
in :issue:`42392`.)
|
||||
|
||||
CPython bytecode changes
|
||||
========================
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue