Backed out changeset b9c9691c72c5

Issue #28858: The change b9c9691c72c5 introduced a regression. It seems like
_PyObject_CallArg1() uses more stack memory than
PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs().
This commit is contained in:
Victor Stinner 2016-12-04 22:59:09 +01:00
parent c8d03187ff
commit de4ae3d486
33 changed files with 83 additions and 71 deletions

View file

@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ filter_next(filterobject *lz)
ok = PyObject_IsTrue(item);
} else {
PyObject *good;
good = _PyObject_CallArg1(lz->func, item);
good = PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs(lz->func, item, NULL);
if (good == NULL) {
Py_DECREF(item);
return NULL;
@ -1519,7 +1519,7 @@ min_max(PyObject *args, PyObject *kwds, int op)
while (( item = PyIter_Next(it) )) {
/* get the value from the key function */
if (keyfunc != NULL) {
val = _PyObject_CallArg1(keyfunc, item);
val = PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs(keyfunc, item, NULL);
if (val == NULL)
goto Fail_it_item;
}
@ -2044,9 +2044,9 @@ builtin_round(PyObject *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwds)
}
if (ndigits == NULL || ndigits == Py_None)
result = _PyObject_CallNoArg(round);
result = PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs(round, NULL);
else
result = _PyObject_CallArg1(round, ndigits);
result = PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs(round, ndigits, NULL);
Py_DECREF(round);
return result;
}