bpo-45386: Handle strftime's ValueError graciously in xmlrpc.client (GH-28765) (GH-28934)

At import time, the xmlrpc.client module uses different date formats to
test strftime so it can format years with 4 digits consistently.
Depending on the underlying C library and its strftime implementation
some of these calls can result in ValueErrors, blocking the
xmlrpc.client module from being imported.

This commit changes the behavior of this bit of code to react to
ValueError exceptions, treating the format that caused them as an
non-viable option.
(cherry picked from commit 1c83135381)

Co-authored-by: rtobar <rtobarc@gmail.com>

Lib/xmlrpc/client.py

@@ -264,16 +264,22 @@ boolean = Boolean = bool
 
 # Issue #13305: different format codes across platforms
 _day0 = datetime(1, 1, 1)
-if _day0.strftime('%Y') == '0001':      # Mac OS X
+def _try(fmt):
+    try:
+        return _day0.strftime(fmt) == '0001'
+    except ValueError:
+        return False
+if _try('%Y'):      # Mac OS X
     def _iso8601_format(value):
         return value.strftime("%Y%m%dT%H:%M:%S")
-elif _day0.strftime('%4Y') == '0001':   # Linux
+elif _try('%4Y'):   # Linux
     def _iso8601_format(value):
         return value.strftime("%4Y%m%dT%H:%M:%S")
 else:
     def _iso8601_format(value):
         return value.strftime("%Y%m%dT%H:%M:%S").zfill(17)
 del _day0
+del _try
 
 
 def _strftime(value):

Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2021-10-07-00-05-05.bpo-45386.q9ORpA.rst

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Make :mod:`xmlrpc.client` more robust to C runtimes where the underlying C
+``strftime`` function results in a ``ValueError`` when testing for year
+formatting options.