[3.13] gh-110383: Clarify "non-integral" wording in pow() docs (GH-119688) (#120206)

(cherry picked from commit 6646a9da26)

Co-authored-by: Aditya Borikar <adityaborikar2@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Miss Islington (bot) 2024-06-07 12:03:06 +02:00 committed by GitHub
parent 1e43f76b76
commit ffa7d82a04
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194

View file

@ -1558,7 +1558,9 @@ are always available. They are listed here in alphabetical order.
returns ``100``, but ``pow(10, -2)`` returns ``0.01``. For a negative base of returns ``100``, but ``pow(10, -2)`` returns ``0.01``. For a negative base of
type :class:`int` or :class:`float` and a non-integral exponent, a complex type :class:`int` or :class:`float` and a non-integral exponent, a complex
result is delivered. For example, ``pow(-9, 0.5)`` returns a value close result is delivered. For example, ``pow(-9, 0.5)`` returns a value close
to ``3j``. to ``3j``. Whereas, for a negative base of type :class:`int` or :class:`float`
with an integral exponent, a float result is delivered. For example,
``pow(-9, 2.0)`` returns ``81.0``.
For :class:`int` operands *base* and *exp*, if *mod* is present, *mod* must For :class:`int` operands *base* and *exp*, if *mod* is present, *mod* must
also be of integer type and *mod* must be nonzero. If *mod* is present and also be of integer type and *mod* must be nonzero. If *mod* is present and