Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sergey B Kirpichev
6988ff02a5
gh-61103: Support double complex (_Complex) type in ctypes (#120894)
Example:

```pycon
>>> import ctypes
>>> ctypes.__STDC_IEC_559_COMPLEX__
1
>>> libm = ctypes.CDLL('libm.so.6')
>>> libm.clog.argtypes = [ctypes.c_double_complex]
>>> libm.clog.restype = ctypes.c_double_complex
>>> libm.clog(1+1j)
(0.34657359027997264+0.7853981633974483j)
```

Co-authored-by: Nice Zombies <nineteendo19d0@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Bénédikt Tran <10796600+picnixz@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <vstinner@python.org>
2024-07-01 10:54:33 +02:00
Eric Snow
b87d288275
gh-105699: Use a Thread-Local Variable for PKGCONTEXT (gh-105740)
This fixes a race during import. The existing _PyRuntimeState.imports.pkgcontext is shared between interpreters, and occasionally this would cause a crash when multiple interpreters were importing extensions modules at the same time.  To solve this we add a thread-local variable for the value.  We also leave the existing state (and infrequent race) in place for platforms that do not support thread-local variables.
2023-06-13 18:58:23 -06:00
Eric Snow
456cd513e3
gh-81057: Get the c-analyzer tool working again. (gh-92246) 2022-05-03 13:18:27 -06:00
Eric Snow
4fe72090de
bpo-36876: Small adjustments to the C-analyzer tool. (GH-23045)
This is a little bit of clean-up, small fixes, and additional helpers prior to building an updated & accurate list of globals to eliminate.
2020-10-30 15:46:52 -06:00
Eric Snow
345cd37abe
bpo-36876: Fix the C analyzer tool. (GH-22841)
The original tool wasn't working right and it was simpler to create a new one, partially re-using some of the old code. At this point the tool runs properly on the master. (Try: ./python Tools/c-analyzer/c-analyzer.py analyze.)  It take ~40 seconds on my machine to analyze the full CPython code base.

Note that we'll need to iron out some OS-specific stuff (e.g. preprocessor). We're okay though since this tool isn't used yet in our workflow. We will also need to verify the analysis results in detail before activating the check in CI, though I'm pretty sure it's close.

https://bugs.python.org/issue36876
2020-10-22 18:42:51 -06:00