The inspect version was not working with unittest.mock.AsyncMock.
The fix introduces special-casing of AsyncMock in
`inspect.iscoroutinefunction` equivalent to the one
performed in `asyncio.iscoroutinefunction`.
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa <lukasz@langa.pl>
(cherry picked from commit 4261b6bffc)
Co-authored-by: Mehdi ABAAKOUK <sileht@sileht.net>
After a long deliberation we ended up feeling that the message argument for Future.cancel(), added in 3.9, was a bad idea, so we're deprecating it in 3.11 and plan to remove it in 3.13.
Also from the _asyncio C accelerator module,
and adjust one test that the change caused to fail.
For more discussion see the discussion starting here:
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31394#issuecomment-1053545331
(Basically, @asvetlov proposed to return False from cancel()
when there is already a pending cancellation, and I went along,
even though it wasn't necessary for the task group implementation,
and @agronholm has come up with a counterexample that fails
because of this change. So now I'm changing it back to the old
semantics (but still bumping the counter) until we can have a
proper discussion about this.)
asyncio/taskgroups.py is an adaptation of taskgroup.py from EdgeDb, with the following key changes:
- Allow creating new tasks as long as the last task hasn't finished
- Raise [Base]ExceptionGroup (directly) rather than TaskGroupError deriving from MultiError
- Instead of monkey-patching the parent task's cancel() method,
add a new public API to Task
The Task class has a new internal flag, `_cancel_requested`, which is set when `.cancel()` is called successfully. The `.cancelling()` method returns the value of this flag. Further `.cancel()` calls while this flag is set return False. To reset this flag, call `.uncancel()`.
Thus, a Task that catches and ignores `CancelledError` should call `.uncancel()` if it wants to be cancellable again; until it does so, it is deemed to be busy with uninterruptible cleanup.
This new Task API helps solve the problem where TaskGroup needs to distinguish between whether the parent task being cancelled "from the outside" vs. "from inside".
Co-authored-by: Yury Selivanov <yury@edgedb.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svetlov@gmail.com>
Remove the @asyncio.coroutine decorator
enabling legacy generator-based coroutines to be compatible with async/await
code; remove asyncio.coroutines.CoroWrapper used for wrapping
legacy coroutine objects in the debug mode.
The decorator has been deprecated
since Python 3.8 and the removal was initially scheduled for Python 3.10.
asyncio.get_event_loop() emits now a deprecation warning when it creates a new event loop.
In future releases it will became an alias of asyncio.get_running_loop().
# Improve asyncio.wait function
The original code creates the futures set two times.
We can create this set before, avoiding the second creation.
This new behaviour [breaks the aiokafka library](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiokafka/pull/672), because it gives an iterator to that function, so the second iteration become empty.
Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:1st1
Currently, if `asyncio.wait_for()` itself is cancelled it will always
raise `CancelledError` regardless if the underlying task is still
running. This is similar to a race with the timeout, which is handled
already.
When I was fixing bpo-32751 back in GH-7216 I missed the case when
*timeout* is zero or negative. This takes care of that.
Props to @aaliddell for noticing the inconsistency.
This updates _PyErr_ChainStackItem() to use _PyErr_SetObject()
instead of _PyErr_ChainExceptions(). This prevents a hang in
certain circumstances because _PyErr_SetObject() performs checks
to prevent cycles in the exception context chain while
_PyErr_ChainExceptions() doesn't.
When an asyncio.Task is cancelled, the exception traceback now
starts with where the task was first interrupted. Previously,
the traceback only had "depth one."
Currently, if asyncio.wait_for() timeout expires, it cancels
inner future and then always raises TimeoutError. In case
those future is task, it can handle cancelation mannually,
and those process can lead to some other exception. Current
implementation silently loses thoses exception.
To resolve this, wait_for will check was the cancelation
successfull or not. In case there was exception, wait_for
will reraise it.
Co-authored-by: Roman Skurikhin <roman.skurikhin@cruxlab.com>
The previous commits on bpo-29587 got exception chaining working
with gen.throw() in the `yield` case. This patch also gets the
`yield from` case working.
As a consequence, implicit exception chaining now also works in
the asyncio scenario of awaiting on a task when an exception is
already active.
Tests are included for both the asyncio case and the pure
generator-only case.
This PR deprecate explicit loop parameters in all public asyncio APIs
This issues is split to be easier to review.
Third step: locks.py
https://bugs.python.org/issue36373
When the test is ran with `PYTHONWARNINGS=error` the environment variable is passed to the python interpreter used in `assert_python_ok` where `DeprecationWarning` from `@asyncio.coroutine` is converted into an error. Ignore the `DeprecationWarning` in `assert_python_ok`.
https://bugs.python.org/issue37323
Replace asyncio.set_event_loop() with TestCase.set_event_loop() of
test_asyncio.utils: this method calls TestCase.close_loop() which
waits until the executor completes, to avoid leaking dangling
threads.
Inherit from test_asyncio.utils.TestCase rather than
unittest.TestCase.
This will address the common mistake many asyncio users make:
an "except Exception" clause breaking Tasks cancellation.
In addition to this change, we stop inheriting asyncio.TimeoutError
and asyncio.InvalidStateError from their concurrent.futures.*
counterparts. There's no point for these exceptions to share the
inheritance chain.
In 3.9 we'll focus on implementing supervisors and cancel scopes,
which should allow better handling of all exceptions, including
SystemExit and KeyboardInterrupt
When the future returned by shield is cancelled, its completion callback of the
inner future is not removed. This makes the callback list of inner inner future
grow each time a shield is created and cancelled.
This change unregisters the callback from the inner future when the outer
future is cancelled.
https://bugs.python.org/issue35125
inspect.isfunction() processes both inspect.isfunction(func) and
inspect.isfunction(partial(func, arg)) correctly but some other functions in the
inspect module (iscoroutinefunction, isgeneratorfunction and isasyncgenfunction)
lack this functionality. This commits adds a new check in the mentioned functions
in the inspect module so they can work correctly with arbitrarily nested partial
functions.
The C implementation of asyncio.Task currently fails to perform the
cancellation cleanup correctly in the following scenario.
async def task1():
async def task2():
await task3 # task3 is never cancelled
asyncio.current_task().cancel()
await asyncio.create_task(task2())
The actuall error is a hardcoded call to `future_cancel()` instead of
calling the `cancel()` method of a future-like object.
Thanks to Vladimir Matveev for noticing the code discrepancy and to
Yury Selivanov for coming up with a pathological scenario.
