Spotted by @ngnpope.
`isatty` returns False to indicate the file is not a TTY. The C
implementation of _io does that (`Py_RETURN_FALSE`) but I got the
bool backwards in the _pyio implementaiton.
Run them with different locales and different date and time.
Add the @run_with_locales() decorator to run the test with multiple
locales.
Improve the run_with_locale() context manager/decorator -- it now
catches only expected exceptions and reports the test as skipped if no
appropriate locale is available.
- move the Py_Main documentation from the very high level API section
to the initialization and finalization section
- make it clear that it encapsulates a full Py_Initialize/Finalize
cycle of its own
- point out that exactly which settings will be read and applied
correctly when Py_Main is called after a separate runtime
initialization call is version dependent
- be explicit that Py_IsInitialized can be called prior to
initialization
- actually test that Py_IsInitialized can be called prior to
initialization
- flush stdout in the embedding tests that run code so it appears
in the expected order when running with "-vv"
- make "-vv" on the subinterpreter embedding tests less spammy
---------
Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <carolcode@willingconsulting.com>
The function now sets temporarily the LC_CTYPE locale to the locale
of the category that determines the requested value if the locales are
different and the resulting string is non-ASCII.
This temporary change affects other threads.
The term "free variable" has unfortunately become genuinely
ambiguous over the years (presumably due to the names of
some relevant code object instance attributes).
While we can't eliminate that ambiguity at this late date, we can
at least alert people to the potential ambiguity by describing
both the formal meaning of the term and the common
alternative use as a direct synonym for "closure variable".
---------
Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <carolcode@willingconsulting.com>
Increase currently inadequate vertical spacing for the IDLE browsers (path,
module, and stack) on high-resolution monitors.
---------
Co-authored-by: Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
gh-120762: make_ssl_certs: Don't set extensions for the CSR
`openssl req` fails with openssl 3.2.2 because the config line
authorityKeyIdentifier = keyid:always,issuer:always
is not supported for certificate signing requests (since the issuing
certificate authority is not known).
David von Oheimb, the OpenSSL dev that made the change, commented in:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/22966#issuecomment-1858396738 :
> This problem did not show up in older OpenSSL versions because of a bug:
> the `req` app ignored the `-extensions` option unless `-x505` is given,
> which I fixed in https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16865.
(I assume `-x505` is a typo for `-x509`.)
In our `make_cert_key` function:
If `sign` is true:
- We don't pass `-x509` to `req`, so in this case it should be safe to
omit the `-extensions` argument. (Old OpenSSL ignores it, new OpenSSL
fails on it.)
- The extensions are passed to the `ca` call later in the function.
There they take effect, and `authorityKeyIdentifier` is valid.
If `sign` is false, this commit has no effect except rearranging the
CLI arguments.
* Spill the evaluation around escaping calls in the generated interpreter and JIT.
* The code generator tracks live, cached values so they can be saved to memory when needed.
* Spills the stack pointer around escaping calls, so that the exact stack is visible to the cycle GC.
This allows direct intersphinx references to APIs via references
like `` :func:`importlib.metadata.version` ``.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sviatoslav Sydorenko (Святослав Сидоренко) <wk.cvs.github@sydorenko.org.ua>
Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sergey B Kirpichev <skirpichev@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <carolcode@willingconsulting.com>
* gh-117151: increase default buffer size of shutil.copyfileobj() to 256k.
it was set to 16k in the 1990s.
it was raised to 64k in 2019. the discussion at the time mentioned another 5% improvement by raising to 128k and settled for a very conservative setting.
it's 2024 now, I think it should be revisited to match modern hardware. I am measuring 0-15% performance improvement when raising to 256k on various types of disk. there is no downside as far as I can tell.
this function is only intended for sequential copy of full files (or file like objects). it's the typical use case that benefits from larger operations.
for reference, I came across this function while trying to profile pip that is using it to copy files when installing python packages.
* add news
---------
Co-authored-by: rmorotti <romain.morotti@man.com>
