The `}` marked with `/* End instructions */` is the end of the switch.
There is another pair of `{}` around the switch, which is vestigial
from ancient times when it was `for (;;) { switch (opcode) { ... } }`.
All `DISPATCH` macro calls should be inside that pair.
In `_warnings.c`, in the C equivalent of `warnings.warn_explicit()`, if the module globals are given (and not None), the warning will attempt to get the source line for the issued warning. To do this, it needs the module's loader.
Previously, it would only look up `__loader__` in the module globals. In https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/86298 we want to defer to the `__spec__.loader` if available.
The first step on this journey is to check that `loader == __spec__.loader` and issue another warning if it is not. This commit does that.
Since this is a PoC, only manual testing for now.
```python
# /tmp/foo.py
import warnings
import bar
warnings.warn_explicit(
'warning!',
RuntimeWarning,
'bar.py', 2,
module='bar knee',
module_globals=bar.__dict__,
)
```
```python
# /tmp/bar.py
import sys
import os
import pathlib
# __loader__ = pathlib.Path()
```
Then running this: `./python.exe -Wdefault /tmp/foo.py`
Produces:
```
bar.py:2: RuntimeWarning: warning!
import os
```
Uncomment the `__loader__ = ` line in `bar.py` and try it again:
```
sys:1: ImportWarning: Module bar; __loader__ != __spec__.loader (<_frozen_importlib_external.SourceFileLoader object at 0x109f7dfa0> != PosixPath('.'))
bar.py:2: RuntimeWarning: warning!
import os
```
Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:warsaw
This is a small performance improvement, especially for one or two hot
places such as _handle_fromlist() that are called a lot and the
.format() method was being used just to join two strings with a dot.
Otherwise it is merely a readability improvement.
We keep `_ERR_MSG` and `_ERR_MSG_PREFIX` as those may be used elsewhere for canonical looking error messages.
Right now, the tokenizer only returns type and two pointers to the start and end of the token.
This PR modifies the tokenizer to return the type and set all of the necessary information,
so that the parser does not have to this.
Remove the sys.getdxp() function and the Tools/scripts/analyze_dxp.py
script. DXP stands for "dynamic execution pairs". They were related
to DYNAMIC_EXECUTION_PROFILE and DXPAIRS macros which have been
removed in Python 3.11. Python can now be built with "./configure
--enable-pystats" to gather statistics on Python opcodes.
It had to live as a global outside of PyConfig for stable ABI reasons in
the pre-3.12 backports.
This removes the `_Py_global_config_int_max_str_digits` and gets rid of
the equivalent field in the internal `struct _is PyInterpreterState` as
code can just use the existing nested config struct within that.
Adds tests to verify unique settings and configs in subinterpreters.
Fix command line parsing: reject "-X int_max_str_digits" option with
no value (invalid) when the PYTHONINTMAXSTRDIGITS environment
variable is set to a valid limit.
At Python exit, sometimes a thread holding the GIL can wait forever
for a thread (usually a daemon thread) which requested to drop the
GIL, whereas the thread already exited. To fix the race condition,
the thread which requested the GIL drop now resets its request before
exiting.
take_gil() now calls RESET_GIL_DROP_REQUEST() before
PyThread_exit_thread() if it called SET_GIL_DROP_REQUEST to fix a
race condition with drop_gil().
Issue discovered and analyzed by Mingliang ZHAO.
Integer to and from text conversions via CPython's bignum `int` type is not safe against denial of service attacks due to malicious input. Very large input strings with hundred thousands of digits can consume several CPU seconds.
This PR comes fresh from a pile of work done in our private PSRT security response team repo.
Signed-off-by: Christian Heimes [Red Hat] <christian@python.org>
Tons-of-polishing-up-by: Gregory P. Smith [Google] <greg@krypto.org>
Reviews via the private PSRT repo via many others (see the NEWS entry in the PR).
<!-- gh-issue-number: gh-95778 -->
* Issue: gh-95778
<!-- /gh-issue-number -->
I wrote up [a one pager for the release managers](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KjuF_aXlzPUxTK4BMgezGJ2Pn7uevfX7g0_mvgHlL7Y/edit#). Much of that text wound up in the Issue. Backports PRs already exist. See the issue for links.
⚠️⚠️ Note for reviewers, hackers and fellow systems/low-level/compiler engineers ⚠️⚠️
If you have a lot of experience with this kind of shenanigans and want to improve the **first** version, **please make a PR against my branch** or **reach out by email** or **suggest code changes directly on GitHub**.
If you have any **refinements or optimizations** please, wait until the first version is merged before starting hacking or proposing those so we can keep this PR productive.
