(cherry picked from commit cff4d5c5d2)
Co-authored-by: Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svetlov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svetlov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Grainger <tagrain@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: blurb-it[bot] <43283697+blurb-it[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svetlov@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8fb94893e4)
Co-authored-by: Thomas Grainger <tagrain@gmail.com>
The docstring for `BufferedProtocol` states that the class is still an "experimental API", but it has been considered stable since 3.8.
(cherry picked from commit 1d81fdc4c0)
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3e43fac250)
Co-authored-by: Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svetlov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svetlov@gmail.com>
Fix typos in the Lib directory as identified by codespell.
Co-authored-by: Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>.
(cherry picked from commit 745c9d9dfc)
Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
* [Enum] reduce scope of new format behavior
Instead of treating all Enums the same for format(), only user mixed-in
enums will be affected. In other words, IntEnum and IntFlag will not be
changing the format() behavior, due to the requirement that they be
drop-in replacements of existing integer constants.
If a user creates their own integer-based enum, then the new behavior
will apply:
class Grades(int, Enum):
A = 5
B = 4
C = 3
D = 2
F = 0
Now: format(Grades.B) -> DeprecationWarning and '4'
3.12: -> no warning, and 'B'.
(cherry picked from commit f60b07ab6c)
Co-authored-by: Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
asyncio.get_event_loop() emits now a deprecation warning when it creates a new event loop.
In future releases it will became an alias of asyncio.get_running_loop().
test_unix_events.py no longer checks if waitstatus_to_exitcode() mock
has been called or not to make the test more functional, rather than
checking the exact implementation.
This is my first issue!
So, if there's anything wrong, please tell me!
Also, thank you always for all the contributors!
Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:asvetlov
* Update code after merge review from 1st1
* Use a sentinel approach for loop parameter
Remove unnecessary _get_running_loop patching
* Use more clear function name (_verify_parameter_is_marker -> _verify_no_loop)
* Add init method to _LoopBoundMixin to check that loop param wasn't used
# Improve asyncio.wait function
The original code creates the futures set two times.
We can create this set before, avoiding the second creation.
This new behaviour [breaks the aiokafka library](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiokafka/pull/672), because it gives an iterator to that function, so the second iteration become empty.
Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:1st1
* bpo-41696: Fix handling of debug mode in asyncio.run
This allows PYTHONASYNCIODEBUG or -X dev to enable asyncio debug mode
when using asyncio.run
* 📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
Co-authored-by: hauntsaninja <>
Co-authored-by: blurb-it[bot] <43283697+blurb-it[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Stopping and restarting a proactor event loop on windows can lead to
spurious errors logged (ConnectionResetError while reading from the
self pipe). This fixes the issue by ensuring that we don't attempt
to start multiple copies of the self-pipe reading loop.
Currently, if `asyncio.wait_for()` itself is cancelled it will always
raise `CancelledError` regardless if the underlying task is still
running. This is similar to a race with the timeout, which is handled
already.
When I was fixing bpo-32751 back in GH-7216 I missed the case when
*timeout* is zero or negative. This takes care of that.
Props to @aaliddell for noticing the inconsistency.
asyncio.AbstractEventLoop.run_in_executor should be a method that returns an asyncio Future, not an async method.
This matches the concrete implementations, and the documentation better.
