Fix#91487
When transferring a small file, e.g. 256 KiB, the speed of this PR is comparable. However, if a large file, e.g. 65536 KiB, is transferred, asyncio UDP will be over 100 times faster than the original. The speed is presumably significantly faster if a larger file is transferred, e.g. 1048576 KiB.
Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:gpshead
The existing event loop `start_tls()` method is not sufficient for
connections using the streams API. The existing StreamReader works
because the new transport passes received data to the original protocol.
The StreamWriter must then write data to the new transport, and the
StreamReaderProtocol must be updated to close the new transport
correctly.
The new StreamWriter `start_tls()` updates itself and the reader
protocol to the new SSL transport.
Co-authored-by: Ian Good <icgood@gmail.com>
After a long deliberation we ended up feeling that the message argument for Future.cancel(), added in 3.9, was a bad idea, so we're deprecating it in 3.11 and plan to remove it in 3.13.
Example:
async with asyncio.timeout(5):
await some_task()
Will interrupt the await and raise TimeoutError if some_task() takes longer than 5 seconds.
Co-authored-by: Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org>
Also from the _asyncio C accelerator module,
and adjust one test that the change caused to fail.
For more discussion see the discussion starting here:
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31394#issuecomment-1053545331
(Basically, @asvetlov proposed to return False from cancel()
when there is already a pending cancellation, and I went along,
even though it wasn't necessary for the task group implementation,
and @agronholm has come up with a counterexample that fails
because of this change. So now I'm changing it back to the old
semantics (but still bumping the counter) until we can have a
proper discussion about this.)
This changes cancelling() and uncancel() to return the count of pending cancellations.
This can be used to avoid bugs in certain edge cases (e.g. two timeouts going off at the same time).
* Remove task group names (for now)
We're not sure that they are needed, and once in the code
we would never be able to get rid of them.
Yury wrote:
> Ideally, there should be a way for someone to build a "trace"
> of taskgroups/task leading to the current running task.
> We could do that using contextvars, but I'm not sure we should
> do that in 3.11.
* Pass optional name on to task in create_task()
* Remove a bunch of unused stuff
asyncio/taskgroups.py is an adaptation of taskgroup.py from EdgeDb, with the following key changes:
- Allow creating new tasks as long as the last task hasn't finished
- Raise [Base]ExceptionGroup (directly) rather than TaskGroupError deriving from MultiError
- Instead of monkey-patching the parent task's cancel() method,
add a new public API to Task
The Task class has a new internal flag, `_cancel_requested`, which is set when `.cancel()` is called successfully. The `.cancelling()` method returns the value of this flag. Further `.cancel()` calls while this flag is set return False. To reset this flag, call `.uncancel()`.
Thus, a Task that catches and ignores `CancelledError` should call `.uncancel()` if it wants to be cancellable again; until it does so, it is deemed to be busy with uninterruptible cleanup.
This new Task API helps solve the problem where TaskGroup needs to distinguish between whether the parent task being cancelled "from the outside" vs. "from inside".
Co-authored-by: Yury Selivanov <yury@edgedb.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svetlov@gmail.com>
This parameter was accidentally removed when fixing
https://bugs.python.org/issue45129, this reverts the unnecessary changes
there.
Co-authored-by: Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svetlov@gmail.com>
