The summary of this diff is that it:
* adds a `_ctypes_alloc_format_padding` function to append strings like `37x` to a format string to indicate 37 padding bytes
* removes the branches that amount to "give up on producing a valid format string if the struct is packed"
* combines the resulting adjacent `if (isStruct) {`s now that neither is `if (isStruct && !isPacked) {`
* invokes `_ctypes_alloc_format_padding` to add padding between structure fields, and after the last structure field. The computation used for the total size is unchanged from ctypes already used.
This patch does not affect any existing aligment computation; all it does is use subtraction to deduce the amount of paddnig introduced by the existing code.
---
Without this fix, it would never include padding bytes - an assumption that was only
valid in the case when `_pack_` was set - and this case was explicitly not implemented.
This should allow conversion from ctypes structs to numpy structs
Fixes https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/10528
This starts the process. Users who don't specify their own start method
and use the default on platforms where it is 'fork' will see a
DeprecationWarning upon multiprocessing.Pool() construction or upon
multiprocessing.Process.start() or concurrent.futures.ProcessPool use.
See the related issue and documentation within this change for details.
The default `tzinfo` param of the `combine()` signature pseudocode was erroneously `self.tzinfo`.
`self` has no meaning in the context of a classmethod, and the datetime class itself has no `tzinfo` attribute. The correct default pseudocode is `time.tzinfo`, reflecting that the default is the `tzinfo` attribute of the `time` parameter.
This is a follow-up to #100811.
One of the changes in that PR isn't accurate in that
`os.path.join('', '')` will not end in a separator.
This reverts that change to the previous wording that used "only", but
explicitly calls out the case where the last part ends in a separator,
which is what caused confusin in #77607 and motivated the change
in #100811.
`warnings.warn()` gains the ability to skip stack frames based on code
filename prefix rather than only a numeric `stacklevel=` via a new
`skip_file_prefixes=` keyword argument.
We don't need direct C APIs to get at a bigint representation of PyLong but we
do want the few people who need to understand how.
Additional Author: CAM-Gerlach
When testing element truth values, emit a DeprecationWarning in all implementations.
This had emitted a FutureWarning in the rarely used python-only implementation since ~2.7 and has always been documented as a behavior not to rely on.
Matching an element in a tree search but having it test False can be unexpected. Raising the warning enables making the choice to finally raise an exception for this ambiguous behavior in the future.
This PR adds support for float-style formatting for `Fraction` objects: it supports the `"e"`, `"E"`, `"f"`, `"F"`, `"g"`, `"G"` and `"%"` presentation types, and all the various bells and whistles of the formatting mini-language for those presentation types. The behaviour almost exactly matches that of `float`, but the implementation works with the exact `Fraction` value and does not do an intermediate conversion to `float`, and so avoids loss of precision or issues with numbers that are outside the dynamic range of the `float` type.
Note that the `"n"` presentation type is _not_ supported. That support could be added later if people have a need for it.
There's one corner-case where the behaviour differs from that of float: for the `float` type, if explicit alignment is specified with a fill character of `'0'` and alignment type `'='`, then thousands separators (if specified) are inserted into the padding string:
```python
>>> format(3.14, '0=11,.2f')
'0,000,003.14'
```
The exact same effect can be achieved by using the `'0'` flag:
```python
>>> format(3.14, '011,.2f')
'0,000,003.14'
```
For `Fraction`, only the `'0'` flag has the above behaviour with respect to thousands separators: there's no special-casing of the particular `'0='` fill-character/alignment combination. Instead, we treat the fill character `'0'` just like any other:
```python
>>> format(Fraction('3.14'), '0=11,.2f')
'00000003.14'
>>> format(Fraction('3.14'), '011,.2f')
'0,000,003.14'
```
The `Fraction` formatter is also stricter about combining these two things: it's not permitted to use both the `'0'` flag _and_ explicit alignment, on the basis that we should refuse the temptation to guess in the face of ambiguity. `float` is less picky:
```python
>>> format(3.14, '0<011,.2f')
'3.140000000'
>>> format(Fraction('3.14'), '0<011,.2f')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/Users/mdickinson/Repositories/python/cpython/Lib/fractions.py", line 414, in __format__
raise ValueError(
ValueError: Invalid format specifier '0<011,.2f' for object of type 'Fraction'; can't use explicit alignment when zero-padding
```
While the documentation for `optparse` mentioned that both `store_const` and
`append_const` store a constant value, it was not clear where this value was
coming from.
A link to `Option.const` makes this explicit.
The documentation for `rglob` did not mention what `pattern` actually
is.
Mentioning and linking to `fnmatch` makes this explicit, as the
documentation for `fnmatch` both shows the syntax and some explanation.
